2007
DOI: 10.4067/s0716-97602007000400003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A micromethod for high throughput RNA extraction in forest trees

Abstract: A large quantity of high quality RNA is often required in the analysis of gene expression. However, RNA extraction from samples taken from woody plants is generally complex, and represents the main limitation to study gene expression, particularly in refractory species like conifers. Standard RNA extraction protocols are available but they are highly time consuming, and not adapted to large scale extraction. Here we present a high-throughput RNA extraction protocol. This protocol was adapted to a micro-scale b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to other protocols developed for RNA extraction from recalcitrant species and/or tissues (Li & Gray 1997, Sanchez & Mariani 2002, Fils-Lycaon et al 1996, MacLean et al 1996, Birtic & Kranner 2006, De Keukeleire et al 2006, Le Provost et al 2007, Fort et al 2008, Wang et al 2008, the presented method combines the advantages of being phenol-free, easily applicable to a wide range of tissues and not requiring ex pensive commercial kits. Moreover, the varying amounts of starting material needed for different tissues (from 20 mg of styles to 1 g of fruit flesh or peel) enabled testing of the protocol's scalability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other protocols developed for RNA extraction from recalcitrant species and/or tissues (Li & Gray 1997, Sanchez & Mariani 2002, Fils-Lycaon et al 1996, MacLean et al 1996, Birtic & Kranner 2006, De Keukeleire et al 2006, Le Provost et al 2007, Fort et al 2008, Wang et al 2008, the presented method combines the advantages of being phenol-free, easily applicable to a wide range of tissues and not requiring ex pensive commercial kits. Moreover, the varying amounts of starting material needed for different tissues (from 20 mg of styles to 1 g of fruit flesh or peel) enabled testing of the protocol's scalability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All collected samples were ground in liquid nitrogen and a total RNA extraction was performed from 2 g of plant material, according to an optimized method from Provost and colleagues [23]. Then, a DNase treatment was carried out following the instructions of the manufacturer (Kit TURBO DNA-free by Life Technologies, Hong Kong, China).…”
Section: Rna Extraction Cdna Synthesis Library Preparation and Sequmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNAwas extracted from 100 to 150 mg of ground leaf, petiole, and root material by incubation for 10 min with 900 mL of prewarmed hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide extraction buffer (Chang et al, 1993) at 65°C and 660 rpm. After 2-fold extraction with 900 mL of chloroform-isoamyl alcohol, RNA was precipitated overnight (4°C) from the supernatant by the addition of LiCl to a final concentration of 2 M. Pellets were dissolved in 500 mL of sodium chloride-Tris-EDTA buffer (le Provost et al, 2007; prewarmed to 65°C) containing 0.1% SDS. RNA was extracted with chloroform-isoamyl alcohol and precipitated from the aqueous phase by adjusting the NaCl concentration to 0.67 M, adding 1 volume of isopropanol, and subsequent incubation for 5 h at 220°C.…”
Section: Comparison Of Saponin Levels and In Planta Expression Of Ugtmentioning
confidence: 99%