2018
DOI: 10.1111/arcm.12394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A micropalaeontologically based provenance analysis of masonry and floor tiles from the medieval cathedral of Paderborn (northern Germany)

Abstract: The medieval Paderborn Cathedral in Germany underwent five main construction phases in its 1200‐year‐long history. The uniform lithology of the masonry does not allow a precise reconstruction of the source of the material. Unique shale floor tiles of the 11th‐century building, excavated recently, are of unknown origin. Micropalaeontology is here used for an analysis of the provenance of the masonry and tiles. The data indicate that in the course of its building history, geographically and geologically differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results, in combination with those of Lübke et al . (2018) and Kaplan (2009, 2012), indicate that in all construction phases studied, more than one geological formation was mined. The geological age of mortar sample A (IIa) suggests the Salder or Erwitte Formation as a potential source (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results, in combination with those of Lübke et al . (2018) and Kaplan (2009, 2012), indicate that in all construction phases studied, more than one geological formation was mined. The geological age of mortar sample A (IIa) suggests the Salder or Erwitte Formation as a potential source (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Provenance of the building stones, mortar and mortar‐based materials used: (A) Paderborn, including the results of Lübke et al (2018); and (B) St Nicolai, Lippstadt. The position of the sections is shown in Figure 1C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations