2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00089-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin–polymer interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
89
2
23

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
89
2
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Shear bond strength tests have been widely used, mainly because of their relative simplicity and predictability when compared to tensile bond strength tests, in which it is difficult to align the specimen in the testing machine without creating deleterious stress distribution [30]. Advantages in shear tests include specimen preparation and simple test protocols [31]. A new test method using specimens with reduced dimensions has been advocated by some authors [32,33] as a substitute for the conventional shear test: so-called microbond or micro-shear bond strength test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shear bond strength tests have been widely used, mainly because of their relative simplicity and predictability when compared to tensile bond strength tests, in which it is difficult to align the specimen in the testing machine without creating deleterious stress distribution [30]. Advantages in shear tests include specimen preparation and simple test protocols [31]. A new test method using specimens with reduced dimensions has been advocated by some authors [32,33] as a substitute for the conventional shear test: so-called microbond or micro-shear bond strength test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dentin slice, approximately 1.0 mm thick, was cut perpendicular to the long axis of each tooth from the upper-middle coronal portion region using a low-speed diamond saw (IsoMet®, Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL) under water coolant. The occlusal surfaces of slices were ground with silicon carbide paper up to #600 grit to expose a flat dentin surface [22][23][24][25]. The dentin slices were randomly divided into three main groups (containing 10 each) according to the type of composite resins used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for micro-shear bond testing, only a very small bonding area is needed when compared with conventional shear strength test. This should reduce the problems associated with stress distribution at bonding sites, which are inherent in conventional shear testing, and thereby give comparatively higher bond strengths 17,18) . It was reported that bonding of self-etching adhesives to ground enamel in moderately to severely fluorosed teeth was inferior compared to that rendered by phosphoric acid etching 19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, by virtue of its overall simplicity, such as the ease of specimen preparation, simple test protocol, and the ability to rank different products according to bond strength values, several variations of shear bond testing have been widely applied. However, the tendency of failure in the dentinal substrate at loads far less than the shear strength of the dentin due to improved bond strength by the new adhesives, would limit the ability of the test to discern real differences among various adhesive systems 24) . Pashley et al 25) cited this particular issue as a limitation of using conventional shear tests and a reason to consider the microshear test as a reasonable alternative.…”
Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%