A Microsoft-Excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses—an overview and application of NetMetaXL

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of network meta-analysis has increased dramatically in recent years. WinBUGS, a freely available Bayesian software package, has been the most widely used software package to conduct network meta-analyses. However, the learning curve for WinBUGS can be daunting, especially for new users. Furthermore, critical appraisal of network meta-analyses conducted in WinBUGS can be challenging given its limited data manipulation capabilities and the fact that generation of graphical output from network meta-analyses often relies on different software packages than the analyses themselves.MethodsWe developed a freely available Microsoft-Excel-based tool called NetMetaXL, programmed in Visual Basic for Applications, which provides an interface for conducting a Bayesian network meta-analysis using WinBUGS from within Microsoft Excel. . This tool allows the user to easily prepare and enter data, set model assumptions, and run the network meta-analysis, with results being automatically displayed in an Excel spreadsheet. It also contains macros that use NetMetaXL’s interface to generate evidence network diagrams, forest plots, league tables of pairwise comparisons, probability plots (rankograms), and inconsistency plots within Microsoft Excel. All figures generated are publication quality, thereby increasing the efficiency of knowledge transfer and manuscript preparation.ResultsWe demonstrate the application of NetMetaXL using data from a network meta-analysis published previously which compares combined resynchronization and implantable defibrillator therapy in left ventricular dysfunction. We replicate results from the previous publication while demonstrating result summaries generated by the software.ConclusionsUse of the freely available NetMetaXL successfully demonstrated its ability to make running network meta-analyses more accessible to novice WinBUGS users by allowing analyses to be conducted entirely within Microsoft Excel. NetMetaXL also allows for more efficient and transparent critical appraisal of network meta-analyses, enhanced standardization of reporting, and integration with health economic evaluations which are frequently Excel-based.

Is magnetic resonance imaging a viable alternative to ultrasound as the primary imaging modality in the diagnosis of paediatric appendicitis? A systematic review

“…The full text of all retained articles was examined to make the final decision on inclusion/exclusion. All retained full text papers were independently assessed for quality using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) 23 by at least 2 authors and data were extracted directly into a Microsoft Excel 24 spread sheet using a purposefully pre-designed extraction framework to promote consistency. Any inconsistencies in opinion re inclusion or paper quality were resolved through discussion and consensus agreement.…”

Pathological T0 Following Cisplatin-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis

“…The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager v.5.1 (The Nordic Cochrane Center, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008) and R 2.13.0 (R development Core Team, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org). The Bayesian framework meta-analyses were performed by using WinBUGS 1.4 (MRC Biostatistics Unit) and NetMetaXL, which provided an interface using WinBUGS from within Microsoft Excel (36). Two-sided P values <0.5 were considered statistically significant except for in the heterogeneity test, in which a one-sided P value <0.1 was used.…”

“…First, our study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of the NACH regimen with a focus on pCR achievement, which may provide basic evidence to select an appropriate chemotherapy regimen in neoadjuvant setting. Second, to compare the different NACH regimens, we conducted a network metaanalysis based on a Bayesian random effect model using a Microsoft Excel-based tool called NetMetaXL (36), and therefore, we could obtain the information with reference to a hierarchy and the relative variance of the effects of each NACH regimen. Third, the articles included in this analysis were relatively consistent in terms of the treatment cycles (ranged from 2 to 4 cycles) and clinical stage.…”

Comparison of therapies in lumbar degenerative disc disease: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

“…The NMA approach allows any two treatments within the network of evidence to be compared, even when a direct comparison from a trial is not available. Each treatment was considered as an individual node in the network, with networks constructed using NetMetaXL (Figure 1) [27] and analyses performed using WinBUGS Software (version 1.4.3, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK). For outcomes such as device-related SAEs where a network could not be constructed because of insufficient data, an NMA was not conducted.…”