2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.09.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microstructure-dependent Timoshenko beam model based on a modified couple stress theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
381
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,030 publications
(407 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
22
381
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…6, for increasing values of the internal length l. It is quite interesting to point out that the stiffening effects shown in Fig. 7, for L/ h = cost, b/h = cost, and decreasing h are predicted by other non-local theories [25] and are generally considered in agreement with experimental evidence on small-size stiffening effects in several materials [12,13].…”
Section: Simply-supported Beamsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…6, for increasing values of the internal length l. It is quite interesting to point out that the stiffening effects shown in Fig. 7, for L/ h = cost, b/h = cost, and decreasing h are predicted by other non-local theories [25] and are generally considered in agreement with experimental evidence on small-size stiffening effects in several materials [12,13].…”
Section: Simply-supported Beamsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…They can be explained based upon the same reasoning and, for this, further comments are omitted for brevity. It is only worth remarking that similar behaviors are predicted by alternative non-local theories [25,27] and are generally considered in agreement with small-size stiffening effects in many materials [12,13]. …”
Section: Cantilever Beamsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First equation and system of the rest two equations can be solved independently. We have to mention that system (68) coincide with the one presented in [47,50,51] up to notation. Therefore analysis and verification presented in [47,50] take place in considered here case.…”
Section: Timoshenko's Couple Stress Theory Of the Curved Rodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In most publications the considered models are based on Euler-Bernoulli and Timoshenko's hypothesis. Among the many articles on couple stress theories of beams based on Euler-Bernoulli hypothesis we mention here [43][44][45][46] and on Timoshenko's hypothesis we mention here [46][47][48][49][50][51][52], curved rods along with others have been considered in [4,16,42,[53][54][55], for more information see the extensive review paper [56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%