1992
DOI: 10.1109/36.158872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A microwave scattering model for layered vegetation

Abstract: AbstractuAmicrowave scattering model has been developed for layered vegetation based on an iteratlve solution of the radiative transfer equation up to the second order to account for multiple scattering within the canopy and between the ground and the canopy'. The model is designed to operate over a wide frequency range for both deciduous and coniferous forest and to account for th_ branch size distribution, leaf orientation distribution, and branch orientation distribution for each size. The canopy is modeled… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
105
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As for HV, the double-volume scattering is the dominant scattering source at four winter wheat growth stages. The RVI not only included HH, HV, VV, backscattering difference information and then was sensitive to crops structure, but also reduced the environmental and incidence angle effects [48,58]. Therefore, the RVI showed higher correlations with LAI and biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As for HV, the double-volume scattering is the dominant scattering source at four winter wheat growth stages. The RVI not only included HH, HV, VV, backscattering difference information and then was sensitive to crops structure, but also reduced the environmental and incidence angle effects [48,58]. Therefore, the RVI showed higher correlations with LAI and biomass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SAR has some advantages for estimating LAI and biomass at medium to high LAI and biomass [58], and therefore, RPPs were introduced in our study in combination with multispectral data. Previous studies have combined OSVIs and RPPs to estimate biomass and LAI in crops or forests by simply multiplying them [12,24,35,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first implication is that, in order to infer AGB from radar backscatter, different models must be applied to each forest type and the number of models depend on the extent the structural variability of forest types introduce significantly different radar backscatter. The physics underlying the differences in backscatter model is explained by the understanding of the electromagnetic wave propagation and scattering in the forest canopies [16,48,49]. In a two layer forest canopy model consisting of distinct crown and trunk regions, the distorted Born approximation can be used to decompose the backscattering coefficient into three dominant terms rising from first order multiple scattering contributions: Volume scattering, volume-surface double bounce scattering, and surface scattering [16].…”
Section: Radar Backscatter Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several approaches which can be used ( Figure 5). These include the semi-empirical Water Cloud Model (WCM) [22], Radiative Transfer Model (RTM) [37] and 3D parameterizations [38]. In this work the (WCM) was used.…”
Section: Vegetation Moisture Datamentioning
confidence: 99%