A mindset for user-centered spatial applications

Hockenberry, Matthew; Hoff, Jeff; Gens, Rob; Selker, Ted

doi:10.1007/s10339-006-0061-y

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, the static viewing angles that destabilized analogue chorography are substituted with a multitude of viewpoints captured during the drone imaging process. When digitally assembled, this kaleidoscopic array of angles is conveyed through user-centred mapping, which dynamically reconfigures a map representation to follow the map-user's point of view (Hackenberry et al 2006). Granting the map-user active input enhances the historical essence of chorography as analogous to a highly malleable lens that continuously changes viewpoints (Nuti 1999).…”

Section: Supposition 2: Digitally Re-envisioning Chorographymentioning

confidence: 99%

The drone’s eye: applications and implications for landscape architecture

Kullmann

2017

Landscape Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: the satellite's gaze As the most 'grounded' of the arts, landscape architecture has a more restrained legacy of engagement with technological innovation than other design disciplines. This reticence is partially a consequence of landscape architecture's customary role as ameliorator of the negative impacts of industrialization. It also results from working with the medium of the real landscape, whose unruly nature tends to resist both straightforward representation and technological fashion (Kullmann 2014; St-Denis 2007). Nevertheless, innovation in mapping and imaging technology has clearly influenced the evolution of landscape architectural theory and practice. In the twentieth century, both the modern theodolite and aeroplane photography transformed the way in which landscape architects imaged, and hence designed, the landscape. Whereas the surveyor's precise triangulation abstracted a site into discrete features, the aeroplane's orthophotos provided intriguing glimpses into the material landscape of continuity and interconnectedness (Anker 2001).

show abstract

Section: Supposition 2: Digitally Re-envisioning Chorographymentioning

confidence: 99%

The drone’s eye: applications and implications for landscape architecture

Kullmann

2017

Landscape Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because navigation devices are regarded as popular mobile devices (Raper et al 2007), the map display of these devices and environmental influences need to be focused by cartographic research as well as the needs of the map user (Hockenberry et al 2006). The screen size of mobile devices is an important limitation on cartographic visualization for mobile maps (Dillemuth 2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influences of map view and environmental conditions on mental maps of map users

Wunderlich

2009

Cogn Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As a consequence, viewing the map from alternative directions destabilized the overall composition (Nuti 1999). In digital form, a multitude of angles may be conveyed through subject-centred mapping to reconfigure dynamically a map representation to respond to the map-user's point of view (Hackenberry et al 2006). Granting the map-user active input potentially enhances the historical essence of chorography as analogous to a highly malleable lens that continuously changes viewpoints (Nuti 1999).…”

Section: Chorography: Third Revival?mentioning

confidence: 99%