2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A minimally invasive methodology based on morphometric parameters for day 2 embryo quality assessment

Abstract: The risk to maternal-foetal health due to multiple pregnancies can be decreased by reducing the number of transferred embryos. Therefore, new tools for selecting embryos with the highest implantation potential should be developed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the predictive implantation ability of morphological and morphometric variables by analyzing images of embryos. This is a retrospective study of 135 embryo photographs from 112 IVF-ICSI cycles performed between January and March 2011. The embryos … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other morphometric characteristics have been considered as predictor for developmental competence or implantation, such as zygote size, nuclear size, embryo area and perimeter, equivalent circle radius of the embryo, embryonic roundness, and zona pellucida thickness [ 48 50 ]. Morphometric measurements may minimize the variability among different embryologists and clinics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other morphometric characteristics have been considered as predictor for developmental competence or implantation, such as zygote size, nuclear size, embryo area and perimeter, equivalent circle radius of the embryo, embryonic roundness, and zona pellucida thickness [ 48 50 ]. Morphometric measurements may minimize the variability among different embryologists and clinics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The morphometric parameters that were measured using ‘line and oval selection tools’ are as follows: mean embryo diameter (MED), mean zona pellucida diameter (MZPD), embryo area (EA), zona pellucida area (ZPA), embryo perimeter (EP), and zona pellucida perimeter (ZPP) [19, 20].
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last 3-4 decades of human laboratory assisted reproduction, little has changed in embryo evaluation and selection for transfer, with the exceptions of recent time-lapse micro-videography of morphometrics and morphokinetics (Wong et al, 2010;Kirkegaard et al, 2012Kirkegaard et al, , 2013Paternot et al, 2013;Ziebe, 2013;Molina et al, 2014;Basile et al, 2015) and preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy (Lyet al, 2011;Franasiak et al, 2014). Classically, embryo analysis and selection has been performed manually with microscopic observations of cleavage rates, embryo cell number (in relation to time of development), degree of cellular fragmentation, blastocyst formation, stage of blastocyst development (early, full, expanding, expanded or hatching) and/or cellular contributions of the blastocyst inner cell mass and trophectoderm.…”
Section: Embryo Analysis and Selection With Microfluidicsmentioning
confidence: 99%