2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-003-0249-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A minimax formula for principal eigenvalues and application to an antimaximum principle

Abstract: A minimax formula for the principal eigenvalue of a nonselfadjoint elliptic problem was established in [17]. In this paper we extend this formula to the case where an indefinite weight is present. An application is given to the study of the uniformity of the antimaximum principle. (2000): 35J20, 35P15 Mathematics Subject Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This last formula is the exact generalization of the formula proved by M. Donsker and S. Varadhan [14] and by C. J. Holland [26] in bounded domains with Dirichlet or Neumann boudary conditions. This formula has been generalized to the principal eigenvalues of an elliptic operator with undefinite weight by T. Godoy, J.-P. Gossez and S. Paczka [18] and to parabolic operators by T. Godoy, U. Kaufmann and S. Paczka [19].…”
Section: Counterexample In Higher Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This last formula is the exact generalization of the formula proved by M. Donsker and S. Varadhan [14] and by C. J. Holland [26] in bounded domains with Dirichlet or Neumann boudary conditions. This formula has been generalized to the principal eigenvalues of an elliptic operator with undefinite weight by T. Godoy, J.-P. Gossez and S. Paczka [18] and to parabolic operators by T. Godoy, U. Kaufmann and S. Paczka [19].…”
Section: Counterexample In Higher Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This guarantees that the infimum over u in the minimax formula is achieved. Of course, references should be made to Lemmas 3.2 and 3.4 from [8] instead of Lemmas 3.2 and 3.3 from [9]. In the proof of (ii) from Proposition 4.4, one should also replace a 0 ≥ 0 by a 0 ≥ 0 and either a 0 ≡ 0 or b 0 ≡ 0.…”
Section: Neumann-robin Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…e.g. [8,10,17]). In case of existence we will again denote by λ α the largest principal eigenvalue of (6.1) α .…”
Section: Neumann-robin Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations