1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00933382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A minimax optimal control problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L = 0, g = 0) has been extensively studied from various point of views, including dynamic programming, numerical approximations, and necessary conditions (see e.g. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][14][15][16]19,20]). In particular, in [7] Barron and Ishii established a Hamilton-Jacobi equation by regarding a L ∞ problem as the limit of standard L p optimal control problems.…”
Section: X(t) = F (T X(t) A(t)) X(τ ) = Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L = 0, g = 0) has been extensively studied from various point of views, including dynamic programming, numerical approximations, and necessary conditions (see e.g. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][14][15][16]19,20]). In particular, in [7] Barron and Ishii established a Hamilton-Jacobi equation by regarding a L ∞ problem as the limit of standard L p optimal control problems.…”
Section: X(t) = F (T X(t) A(t)) X(τ ) = Ymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64-65. Holmåker [13] considered a minimax problem given in control form and derived a general Pontryagin-type maximum principle; p. 395. This principle also includes transversality end conditions.…”
Section: A Basic Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ii{t) = x 2 (t) xi(0)=0, i j ( 0 = «(0 352(0) = 0 , terminal state constraint zi(l) = 1, 12(1) = 0. The exact analytical solution for this problem is available in [10]. The solution obtained from the present calculations using n p = 10 and arbitrary initial guess is g$ = 16.61 as compared to the exact value of ffSexact = 16.68.…”
Section: Example 2 Minimax Optimal Control Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%