2016
DOI: 10.5888/pcd13.150478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mismatch Between Patient Education Materials About Sickle Cell Disease and the Literacy Level of Their Intended Audience

Abstract: IntroductionDespite the first goal of the 2010 National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy, the literacy demands of much health information exceeds the reading skills of most US adults. The objective of this study was to assess the health literacy level of publicly available patient education materials for people with sickle cell disease (SCD).MethodsWe used 5 validated tools to evaluate 9 print and 4 online patient education materials: the simple measure of gobbledygook (SMOG) to assess reading grade leve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we found very few elements of actionability. In this regard the most visible German websites on melanoma immunotherapy were in line with other patient education material that was previously assessed by the same tool [41,42]. However, the application of more elements of actionability and interactivity (e.g.…”
Section: Principal Results and Comparison With Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, we found very few elements of actionability. In this regard the most visible German websites on melanoma immunotherapy were in line with other patient education material that was previously assessed by the same tool [41,42]. However, the application of more elements of actionability and interactivity (e.g.…”
Section: Principal Results and Comparison With Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…7,8 The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality developed the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for assessment of the overall understandability and actionability of any audiovisual or written information for patients. 9,10 The quality of information provided on websites can be evaluated using two instruments: the global quality score 11 and the Health on the Net code instrument (www.hon.ch/HONcode/). [11][12][13] The ALEXA tool is used to investigate website popularity and visibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process started with the expertise of SCD providers across the country to curate the guidelines into the essential knowledge content that health care providers would use to care for individuals with SCD. As previous literature has demonstrated, educational material for SCD is often developed at too high of a reading level [ 72 ]. Therefore, our next step was to work with a health literacy expert team to make the language more accessible; however, when we approached the community with the adapted guidelines, the community could not extract meaningful content and did not yet find the guidelines useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%