“…Speaking seven months after the parliamentary debates, he revealed that his government had been faced with intense resistance, if not outright opposition, to the Vandalism Act's mandatory corporal punishment from the government's own legal officers (Lee 1967). Lee's audience consisted primarily of private‐sector lawyers but included the state's elite legal actors—the chief justice, the High Court judiciary, the attorney general, and the speaker of Parliament (Tan 1967, xxxv). To this audience of Singapore's legal complex, Prime Minister Lee revealed that the attorney general, technically the highest‐ranking government legal officer in a Westminster system, had vigorously opposed the Vandalism Act:…”