“…74 Against this background, Heigel could be interpreted as embodying a type of historian that was no longer available to his students -just as Alfred Dove had seemed as a voice from the past in continuing, until his death in 1916, the habit of preferring finely crafted essays over deftly footnoted monographs. 75 Heigel had wanted to be a whole man in an age that saw the rise to prominence of a new scholarly persona, the Waitzean Fachmann, but been unable to reverse the trend, despite all inspiration that he had provided to his students. In the melancholic words of perhaps his most talented student, the Bavarian archivist and future Munich professor Ivo Striedinger: "The peculiar mixture of heart and mind that characterized him has once existed, but will not return..." 76…”