A Mixed Bag of Results: Village Elections in Contemporary China

Abstract

While there is only little transformation to the absolute power of the party-state to be detected, some grassroots democratic experiments, however, are receiving enormous attention of the world, especially village elections. Nevertheless, this preliminary exercise of democracy is widely characterized as a mixed bag of results. Since its first conduction, it has experienced immense development and bought great impact not only on different rural political institutions, but also on common mass villagers, as well as changes to the local governance. But at the same time, the limitations of the factual effectiveness of these elections can hardly be underestimated and such aspects as the standardization of electoral procedures are still to be further improved. Moreover, given the wide variations across Chinese countryside and the strong oppositions from all levels, the future of China's village elections remain hard to gauge.

Soft Power and Vaccine Diplomacy: An Analysis of China's Global Image Enhancement during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Critics blame that around 96% of China's vaccines and more than 99% of its PPEs that were exported were sold and not donated as China portrayed. 79 China denies the claims, stating that China even provided free samples before and then the equipment. Another criticism is that Beijing allocated the supplies on bilateral relationships, whereas many wealthy countries, including the United States, provided substantial vaccine supply to COVAX.…”

Village Elections, Grassroots Governance and the Restructuring of State Power: An Empirical Study in Southern Peri-urban China

“…Accompanying this massive wave of urbanization were incessant land disputes and social conflicts in many localities. To safeguard their landed interests, villagers engaged in collective action and resistance against frenetic land grabbing orchestrated by 1 Baum and Shevchenko 1999;Lin 20112 O'Brien 1994Li 2003; Wines 2012 3 Walker 2006 4 Hu 2005 5 Zhong and Chen 2002 6 Kelliher 1997 7 Lawrence 1994;Shi 1999;Howell 2007 corrupt, self-serving local officials. 8 Moreover, villagers increasingly exercised their voting rights in formal elections to support village leaders who were prepared to repel top-down national policies that threatened to compromise their benefits and welfare.…”