48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mixed-Fidelity Approach for Design of Low-Boom Supersonic Aircraft

Abstract: This paper documents a mixed-fidelity approach for the design of low-boom supersonic aircraft as a viable approach for designing a practical low-boom supersonic configuration. A low-boom configuration that is based on low-fidelity analysis is used as the baseline. Tail lift is included to help tailor the aft portion of the ground signature. A comparison of low-and high-fidelity analysis results demonstrates the necessity of using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis in a low-boom supersonic configuratio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predicted sonic boom ground signatures are compared against existing tools for the sake of validating the current method. The first comparison is for an aircraft concept for which the offbody pressure distribution at three body lengths is obtained from a stretched-grid computational fluid dynamics (CFD) run [15,21] using USM3D [22] and is given in Fig. 3a.…”
Section: Results Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predicted sonic boom ground signatures are compared against existing tools for the sake of validating the current method. The first comparison is for an aircraft concept for which the offbody pressure distribution at three body lengths is obtained from a stretched-grid computational fluid dynamics (CFD) run [15,21] using USM3D [22] and is given in Fig. 3a.…”
Section: Results Validation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) The first extension is the ability to handle different input waveforms: either an offbody dp=p pressure waveform or an F function generated, perhaps from boom minimization theory or an equivalent area distribution used in design exercises [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current analysis and design process [4,5] for supersonic concepts at NASA Langley Research Center uses an automated USM3D [6,7] CFD analysis. This automated mesh generation and CFD analysis requires several hours to obtain off-body pressure distributions for a conceptual configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%