A mixed-method approach to assess users' intention to use mobile health (mHealth) using PLS-SEM and fsQCA

Abstract

PurposeDespite the enormous potential of mobile health (mHealth), identifying the asymmetric relationship among the predictors towards intention to use (ITU) of mHealth tends to remain unresolved. This study aims to investigate the predictors and their asymmetric effects on ITU of mHealth through patients and healthcare professionals.Design/methodology/approachAn integrated information systems (IS) model with four additional constructs has been developed to analyze symmetric and asymmetric effects on ITU of mHealth. An exploratory survey on 452 mHealth users with prior experience was conducted to evaluate the model using a mixed-method approach including partial least squares-based structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) technique.FindingsThe findings show that facilitating conditions, personal awareness building, perceived enjoyment, effort expectancy and perceived usefulness have predictive power for ITU of mHealth. In contrast, fsQCA reveals four more alternative solutions, including the main drivers explored by PLS-SEM. The results indicate that various conditions that were not crucial in PLS-SEM analysis are shown to be sufficient conditions in fsQCA.Research limitations/implicationsThis study contributes to theory by integrating self-actualization factors (i.e. personal awareness building, patients as decision support unit) into the IS model. And practically, this study makes an essential contribution to users' ITU of mHealth, enabling relevant stakeholders to build strategies to implement mHealth successfully.Originality/valueWhile mHealth has revolutionized healthcare and the prior literature only showed linear relationships, this empirical study revealed asymmetrical relationships among the determinants of ITU of mHealth. Thus, this study extends to the growing body of literature on the use of mHealth technology in the least developing nation.

Understanding the Drivers of Ghanaian Citizens' Adoption Intentions of Mobile Health Services

“…Also, the impact of perceived ease of use on intention to use is in agreement with other studies that showed perceived ease of use of m-health services is a positive determinant of the intention to use m-health services ( 3 , 26 , 87 , 118 ). Other scholars have also demonstrated that both the TAM/UTAUT key constructs of perceived usefulness (performance expectancy) and ease of use (effort expectancy) of mobile health systems drive the behavioral intention to use m-health ( 13 , 119 – 121 ). The significant impact of both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on the citizens' intention to recommend the adoption of m-health services appears to be a special and key finding of this research.…”

Analysis of factors affecting the effectiveness of face-to-face marketing learning via TikTok, YouTube and video conferencing

“…While PLS-SEM establishes causal relationships between related constructs, fsQCA investigates the necessary and sufficient conditions for the factors in PLS-SEM analysis to lead to a result [ 89 ]. To obtain more precise and clearer conclusions from the PLS-SEM results, it is combined with fsQCA [ 90 ]. The PLS-SEM results with fsQCA are highly promising because they allow for a unique analysis that combines both symmetric and asymmetric perspectives, while accounting for measurement error inherent in the measurements.…”

Identifying the factors influencing enterprise digital transformation intention: an empirical study based on net effects and joint effects

“…Second, it does not require a large sample size (Hair et al ., 2019). The second part tested the effect of different combinations of independent variables on the dependent variable via fsQCA, a combination of fuzzy set and logic principles with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) (Ragin, 2000; Pappas et al ., 2020), which has been widely used to examine users' behavior or emotions in traditional business and e-commerce (Pappas et al ., 2020; Chuah et al ., 2021; Yang, 2021; Gligor et al ., 2021; Hasan and Bao, 2022). It has also been used to explore digital transformation factors (Chen and Tian, 2022), as it enables the capture of multiple paths that lead to the same outcome (Pappas et al ., 2020).…”