2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed-methods case study on resident thermal comfort and attitude towards peak shifting of space heating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field trial in 12 multi-family blocks with 93 residents, who were exposed to load shifts for two weeks during early winter, showed that no statistically significant difference was found in thermal sensation or thermal satisfaction and that perception and acceptance of DSM in residential space heating is subject to four factors: (1) set indoor climate conditions, (2) timing and magnitude of the load shifts, (3) individual control and (4) communication [10]. Christensen et al [11] showed in a 4-week field trial in three detached houses in Denmark that residents accept changing thermal conditions (temperature boosts) only after additional explanation of the monetary or environmental benefits of such interventions in their typical thermal comfort preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The field trial in 12 multi-family blocks with 93 residents, who were exposed to load shifts for two weeks during early winter, showed that no statistically significant difference was found in thermal sensation or thermal satisfaction and that perception and acceptance of DSM in residential space heating is subject to four factors: (1) set indoor climate conditions, (2) timing and magnitude of the load shifts, (3) individual control and (4) communication [10]. Christensen et al [11] showed in a 4-week field trial in three detached houses in Denmark that residents accept changing thermal conditions (temperature boosts) only after additional explanation of the monetary or environmental benefits of such interventions in their typical thermal comfort preferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Besides of these studies, there are, to the knowledge of the authors of this paper, no reported investigations on appropriate temperature sensor location to obtain a measurement that reflects residents' thermal sensation and satisfaction. Christensen et al [14] conducted a study mimicking the behaviour of an EMPC for space heating in three residential buildings in Denmark. Utilising digital radiator thermostats, the temperature setpointand thus the indoor air temperature -was increased before a typical morning peak period to load the thermal mass of the building allowing the temperature to drift back to the initial setpoint during the morning peak without using energy for space heating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%