Background
Medical tattooing is often applied in the context of plastic, aesthetic, and reconstructive surgery to help achieve the best cosmetic outcome.
Objectives
This article reviews various conditions that medical tattooing have been empirically studied in terms of patient satisfaction outcomes; makes practice recommendations; and suggests future directions for research.
Methods
This review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if the tattooing application was associated with a medical condition and if outcome data was provided using at least a case series methodology. Where no cohort or clinical series exist, case examples are used from the literature and the author’s practice to illustrate emerging medical tattooing applications that need further evaluation.
Results
Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were applied to the following conditions: baldness, vitiligo, scars from incisions, lacerations or burns, and nipple areola complex reconstruction following breast surgery.
Conclusions
The application of medical tattooing has shown high levels of patient satisfaction across various conditions. The practice recommendation grade is “B” or recommend since the level of evidence for these interventions ranged from III to IV according to the ASPS guidelines. This means clinicians can consider this treatment alternative, but they should be alert to new information and be sensitive to patient preferences. Recommendations are made for reporting future research including clearly describing procedural details, identifying the professional performing the procedure, increased use of standardized outcome measures, and that satisfaction ratings be assessed by someone independent of the health service provider. Further research using RCT methodology with waitlist controls is needed.