A mixed methods evaluation of the maternal-newborn dashboard in Ontario: dashboard attributes, contextual factors, and facilitators and barriers to use: a study protocol

Abstract

BackgroundThere are wide variations in maternal-newborn care practices and outcomes across Ontario. To help institutions and care providers learn about their own performance, the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario has implemented an audit and feedback system, the Maternal-Newborn Dashboard (MND), for all hospitals providing maternal-newborn care. The dashboard provides (1) near real-time feedback, with site-specific and peer comparison data about six key performance indicators; (2) a visual display of evidence-practice gaps related to the indicators; and (3) benchmarks to provide direction for practice change. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the dashboard, dashboard attributes, contextual factors, and facilitation/support needs that influence the use of this audit and feedback system to improve performance. The objectives of this study are to (1) evaluate the effect of implementing the dashboard across Ontario; (2) explore factors that potentially explain differences in the use of the MND among hospitals; (3) measure factors potentially associated with differential effectiveness of the MND; and (4) identify factors that predict differences in hospital performance.Methods/designA mixed methods design includes (1) an interrupted time series analysis to evaluate the effect of the intervention on six indicators, (2) key informant interviews with a purposeful sample of directors/managers from up to 20 maternal-newborn care hospitals to explore factors that influence the use of the dashboard, (3) a provincial survey of obstetrical directors/managers from all maternal-newborn hospitals in the province to measure factors that influence the use of the dashboard, and (4) a multivariable generalized linear mixed effects regression analysis of the indicators at each hospital to quantitatively evaluate the change in practice following implementation of the dashboard and to identify factors most predictive of use.DiscussionStudy results will provide essential data to develop knowledge translation strategies for facilitating practice change, which can be further evaluated through a future cluster randomized trial.

Effect of a population-level performance dashboard intervention on maternal-newborn outcomes: an interrupted time series study

“…In addition, an electronic online audit and feedback tool (the Maternal Newborn Dashboard, hereafter referred to as the Dashboard) was built into this new system to address quality of care issues. 3 …”

Using report cards and dashboards to drive quality improvement: lessons learnt and lessons still to learn

“…For example, the audit and feedback intervention described in the paper by Weiss and colleagues featured a number of evidence-based elements including repeated, timely data fed back in a non-punitive manner from a trustworthy source 23. It also featured clear comparators.…”

Usability Testing a Potentially Inappropriate Medication Dashboard: A Core Component of the Dashboard Development Process

“…7 During the evaluation process, many developers in the health care setting rely on practical tools to assess usability that take into consideration the time limitations of clinical users, including heuristic checklists, questionnaires, surveys, interviews, and focus groups. [8][9][10][11] While these can expose end user perceptions of usefulness, implementation feasibility, and satisfaction, a usability study involving real-time observation of users completing specified, typical tasks provides added insight into the quality of user interaction with a given application within the intended setting. 12,13 The Veterans Affairs' (VA) primary care workforce development project, the Geriatric Scholars Program (GSP), supports the integration of geriatrics into primary care.…”