1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-3538(98)00105-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A mixed-mode failure criterion derived from tests on symmetric and asymmetric specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LP method is an analytical approach based on a stress intensity factor calculation defined by K = K I + iK II (being K I and K II the mode I and mode II stress intensity factors) (Ducept et al, 1999;Hutchinson and Suo, 1991). Figure 8 shows the moments near the crack tip in a cracked specimen for a general loading state.…”
Section: Partition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The LP method is an analytical approach based on a stress intensity factor calculation defined by K = K I + iK II (being K I and K II the mode I and mode II stress intensity factors) (Ducept et al, 1999;Hutchinson and Suo, 1991). Figure 8 shows the moments near the crack tip in a cracked specimen for a general loading state.…”
Section: Partition Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Source: Ducept et al (1999) The resulting expressions of the local method to calculate G I and G II are as follows (Ducept et al, 1999):…”
Section: Figure 8 Moments Near the Crack Tip For A General Loading Statementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking a more in-depth investigation into the partitioned fracture energy values, it is evident that the Global Method dedicates the bulk of the total fracture energy to Mode I contributions, while the Local Method allows for a more even distribution of Mode I and Mode II contributions. From the literature, it has been extensively discussed for homogeneous specimens that the participation of Mode I is severely exaggerated using the Global Method due to overly rigid fixity assumptions in the cross-section at the location of the crack front [5,6,23,24], leading to further refinement of the original method in order to more correctly depict the support fixity. It can be confirmed from this extended investigation into asymmetric inhomogeneous specimens that the same phenomenon is present [4,8,25].…”
Section: Application Of Derived Relationships To Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15. (Ducept, Gamby & Davies, 1999;Pirondi & Nicoletto, 2001 Epoxy adhesive is a bi-component product: the base (epoxy) and the accelerant (modified amine), it cures at room temperature and it has high temperature resistance (Higgins, 2000). The mixing ratio in volume of the two constituents is 2:1 and it is obtained through the use of 3M EPX applicator (Fig.…”
Section: Second Campaign Of Experimental Test (Glare)mentioning
confidence: 99%