2014
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.l.01031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mobile Compression Device for Thrombosis Prevention in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract: Use of the mobile compression device with or without aspirin for patients undergoing arthroplasty of a lower-extremity joint provides a noninferior risk for the development of venous thromboembolism compared with current pharmacological protocols.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
65
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies suggested that mechanical and pharmacological methods applied for VTE prophylaxis are both effective and, when used in combination, have synergistic effects. 25 Although there are a number of intermittent pneumatic compression systems, little evidence is available at present that differentiates these methods based on VTE prevention. It was demonstrated that calfÀthigh pneumatic compression was more effective than plantar compression for reducing thigh swelling during the early postoperative stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggested that mechanical and pharmacological methods applied for VTE prophylaxis are both effective and, when used in combination, have synergistic effects. 25 Although there are a number of intermittent pneumatic compression systems, little evidence is available at present that differentiates these methods based on VTE prevention. It was demonstrated that calfÀthigh pneumatic compression was more effective than plantar compression for reducing thigh swelling during the early postoperative stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This synchronization significantly improves the venous return profile [47]. Two studies by Colwell et al [48,49] (n = 389 and 3060 patients), demonstrated no difference in efficacy versus chemoprophylactic agents. In a randomized clinical trial comparing the safety of mobile compression to LMWH, where 61% of the cohort received aspirin with the mobile device, they found that the device was associated with fewer bleeding events without compromising VTED efficacy [48].…”
Section: Mobile Vpf-regulated Compression Devicesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This study was powered for efficacy and not bleeding. In a multicenter level II prospective registry study evaluating data from 7 centers, the symptomatic VTE rates were assessed in patients using mobile compression both with (67%) and without aspirin (33%) following TKA (n = 1551) and THA (n = 1509) [49]. The symptomatic VTE-rate in patients treated with the mobile device (0.92%) was non-inferior (within 1%) to rates reported for pharmacologic prophylaxis in prior studies in the literature.…”
Section: Mobile Vpf-regulated Compression Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to accepting the method in VTE prophylaxis in a selected group of patients. The American College of Chest Physicians has recommended mechanical methods (foot or low leg pneumatic pump) alone primarily in patients at high risk of bleeding [26] and, because of their extra benefit, as an additional modality in prophylactic procedures in patients after orthopaedic surgery [27][28][29][30]. The same indications are found in the Polish guidelines [31].…”
Section: Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%