Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) 2006
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2006.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mobile Emergency Triage Decision Support System Evaluation

Abstract: This paper describes an evaluation methodology for assessing the decision impact of the intelligent Mobile Decision Support Triage prototype called "iTriage", which was implemented on a handheld personal digital assistant (PDA). The initial evaluation of iTriage by a clinician has provided validation of the proposed model in terms of its capability to for decision support. Since then the recommended changes have been made to iTriage for further testing. The described research evaluates the prototype using lab … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26 They can also calculate the Revised Trauma Score, Glasgow Coma Score and Early Warning Score. 27 These applications replace the paperbased algorithms that would normally be used for this purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25,26 They can also calculate the Revised Trauma Score, Glasgow Coma Score and Early Warning Score. 27 These applications replace the paperbased algorithms that would normally be used for this purpose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Resource allocation in mass-casualty situations is a significant logistical problem. Particularly under rapidly changing environmental conditions, reliable and timely situational awareness is crucial for making the correct decisions for allocating the available resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall mean accuracy of the MET system was slightly lower, but not significantly different from the accuracy of the ED physicians (70.2% for physicians vs 67.2% for MET) [8]. ITriage [9] is another mobile triage system which has a mean accuracy of 67% with a standard deviation of 29%, whereas the use of the physiological list has a mean accuracy of 53% and a standard deviation of 23%. The disadvantages of the mobile devices are their limited memory and requirement of an internet connection to the data server.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%