2016
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/58/7/075002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model-based, multichannel, real-time capable sawtooth crash detector

Abstract: Control of the time between sawtooth crashes, necessary for ITER and DEMO, requires real-time detection of the moment of the sawtooth crash. In this paper, estimation of sawtooth crash times is demonstrated using the model-based Interacting Multiple Model (IMM) estimator, based on simplified models for the sawtooth crash. In contrast to previous detectors, this detector uses the spatial extent of the sawtooth crash as detection characteristic. The IMM estimator is tuned and applied to multiple ECE channels at … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed agreement between CTS measurements on the one hand and TRANSP and EBdyna_go on the other arises despite the fact that both codes assume full reconnection of the flux surfaces during a sawtooth crash, a condition which is often not satisfied [24,25]. In fact, indications of incomplete reconnection are seen for about 40% of the crashes identified at AUG by automated methods [26]. For the two crashes discussed here, figure 8 indicates the presence of significant post-cursor activity at multiple frequencies, which might be related to incomplete reconnection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The observed agreement between CTS measurements on the one hand and TRANSP and EBdyna_go on the other arises despite the fact that both codes assume full reconnection of the flux surfaces during a sawtooth crash, a condition which is often not satisfied [24,25]. In fact, indications of incomplete reconnection are seen for about 40% of the crashes identified at AUG by automated methods [26]. For the two crashes discussed here, figure 8 indicates the presence of significant post-cursor activity at multiple frequencies, which might be related to incomplete reconnection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…EFIT [29] and RT-LIUQE [30]), MHD analysis (e.g. [31,32]), profile estimators (e.g. the RAPTOR-observer [28,33]), ray-tracing codes (e.g.…”
Section: Plasma and Actuator State Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most characteristic feature of a sawtooth crash is the abrupt flattening of profiles. Previous detection algorithms therefore search for fast changes (edges) in individual signals, e.g., [5,[7][8][9], or for an abrupt change towards a centrally flat profile [6]. In TCV [9], a simple difference filter is applied to averaged central SXR signals with thresholds slowly adapted to previous sawteeth.…”
Section: Sawtooth Crash Detectors and Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…edge detection and does not include any discrimination for signal edges not caused by a sawtooth crash. A model-based approach is applied to ASDEX Upgrade ECE data [6]. The T e profile is compared in steps of 1ms with model predictions.…”
Section: Sawtooth Crash Detectors and Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation