2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for assessing habitat fragmentation caused by new infrastructures in extensive territories – Evaluation of the impact of the Spanish strategic infrastructure and transport plan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other methods aim to assess fragmentation by identifying the state of habitats on different patches of the landscape [45]. They consider local roads and railways with a friction coefficient value equal to zero and for high-speed roads and railways a value equal to 16 (dimensionless number) [46]. In this way, no weight is given to local roads such as those analyzed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other methods aim to assess fragmentation by identifying the state of habitats on different patches of the landscape [45]. They consider local roads and railways with a friction coefficient value equal to zero and for high-speed roads and railways a value equal to 16 (dimensionless number) [46]. In this way, no weight is given to local roads such as those analyzed in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working with functional aspects of connectivity involves using species-specific data, which are difficult to obtain at a national level (Scolozzi & Geneletti, 2012;Smith, 2012). Finally, it is also noteworthy that although both these indicators are valid at a national level (Mancebo Quintana et al, 2010;Ortega et al, 2012;Monzón et al, 2013), the data and GIS methods used differ substantially: accessibility results are obtained by points in the centroids of cities, while connectivity is calculated by pixel, which complicates the map-based representation of both effects simultaneously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural connectivity indicator selected was proposed by Mancebo Quintana et al, (2010), and has proven its usefulness in landscape and infrastructure planning in several studies (Mancebo Quintana et al, 2010;Ortega et al, 2016;De Montis et al, 2017). It assigns a value for scenario 𝑆 𝑘 to each pixel i in the study zone, and measures the area corresponding to the same type of natural habitat as in the cell in question, divided by the effective distance between the pixel and the analogous habitat.…”
Section: Landscape Structural Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Network effects measure the contribution of a particular infrastructure improvement or impact to the transport network as a whole (López et al 2009). These impacts can be understood as the consequences of the development interacting with the impacts of other developments, and include changes to biodiversity (environment) and accessibility (socio-economic impact), which must be considered in terms of the effects on the network (López et al 2009;Mancebo Quintana et al 2010). Correct approaches are crucial to ensure the sustainability of the project when studying the alternatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%