2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-34347-6_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model for Assessing Organizational Learning in Software Development Organizations

Abstract: In order to keep up with the continuously increasing competition and to obtain competitive advantage, software developer organizations (SDO) need to possess the characteristics of Learning Software Organizations (LSO). Maturity is directly related to both learning and knowledge management (KM). However, the major software process improvement (SPI) approaches do not explicitly address how learning capabilities of a SDO can be assessed or what knowledge needs to be managed and how, when, where, or by and for who… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conduct mode utilized in Case Study A has been the hybrid approach, where the OL capabilities of each team have been compared with each other within different reciprocal phases of the undertaken ICSM life cycle, given in Table 61. The applied metrics of Case Study A are provided in [145], including the description of the applied metric in the case study, considering each project group as a development team within the same organization. The NA generic measures are not described in [145] as they were not assessed in the case study.…”
Section: Administration Of Case Study Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The conduct mode utilized in Case Study A has been the hybrid approach, where the OL capabilities of each team have been compared with each other within different reciprocal phases of the undertaken ICSM life cycle, given in Table 61. The applied metrics of Case Study A are provided in [145], including the description of the applied metric in the case study, considering each project group as a development team within the same organization. The NA generic measures are not described in [145] as they were not assessed in the case study.…”
Section: Administration Of Case Study Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied metrics of Case Study A are provided in [145], including the description of the applied metric in the case study, considering each project group as a development team within the same organization. The NA generic measures are not described in [145] as they were not assessed in the case study. The measurement inputs do differ from the generic measures because several input documents (such as Software Project Plan and Training Plan) were not available at the early stages of the case study, therefore the necessary data was collected primarily with the use of questionnaires.…”
Section: Administration Of Case Study Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations