2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-019-0917-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for assessing the impact of linear and nonlinear distortions on a GNSS receiver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the signal passes through the satellite-receiver channel, various imperfections of many components of the cascade channel can cause linear or nonlinear distortions of the signal arriving at the entrance of the digital receiver correlator. These distortions will lead to CCF deformations, making the code loop lock point deviate from the true code phase alignment point and thus resulting in pseudorange biases (Soellner et al 2002;Betz 2002;He et al 2020;Vergara et al 2020). Since different signal modulations, satellite-receiver channel characteristics, and signal processing methods have different effects on pseudorange biases, such biases cannot be eliminated by means of differential techniques and are hard to assimilate into existing system error parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, when the signal passes through the satellite-receiver channel, various imperfections of many components of the cascade channel can cause linear or nonlinear distortions of the signal arriving at the entrance of the digital receiver correlator. These distortions will lead to CCF deformations, making the code loop lock point deviate from the true code phase alignment point and thus resulting in pseudorange biases (Soellner et al 2002;Betz 2002;He et al 2020;Vergara et al 2020). Since different signal modulations, satellite-receiver channel characteristics, and signal processing methods have different effects on pseudorange biases, such biases cannot be eliminated by means of differential techniques and are hard to assimilate into existing system error parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudorange biases are of much concern to satellite navigation applications that use measurements from multiple satellites, multiple receivers, multiple signal components, multiple frequencies, or multiple systems (ICAO 2001;Arikan et al 2008;HaKansson et al 2017;Phelts et al 2014;Pagot et al 2018). For example, using the satellite-specific bias parameters in signal-in-space (SIS) interface control documents (ICDs) and limiting the receiver front-end bandwidth and correlator spacing cannot completely eliminate biases caused by channel imperfections because the impacts of nonideal characteristics of the receiver channel and the mechanism of its interaction with the satellite channel characteristics are neglected (Montenbruck et al 2017;Liu et al 2019b;Vergara et al 2020). In addition to the group delay (T GD ) parameters broadcast in live navigation messages, some branches of international GNSS service (IGS) also release post-processing differential code bias (DCB) products to correct pseudorange biases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation