2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis at leaf scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
115
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there is an ongoing discussion about how sun-induced fluorescence can best be assimilated in existing model formulations to use it to constrain GPP across ecosystems and scales. According to our knowledge only the newest version of the SCOPE model provides an explicit fluorescence interface [48,49], as well as a modified version of the community land model 4 (CLM-4) [50]. Both models facilitate a diagnostic use of sun-induced fluorescence for a GPP assessment across ecosystems and scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, there is an ongoing discussion about how sun-induced fluorescence can best be assimilated in existing model formulations to use it to constrain GPP across ecosystems and scales. According to our knowledge only the newest version of the SCOPE model provides an explicit fluorescence interface [48,49], as well as a modified version of the community land model 4 (CLM-4) [50]. Both models facilitate a diagnostic use of sun-induced fluorescence for a GPP assessment across ecosystems and scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIF variations at the leaf level and at short time scales may reflect changes in LUE (Agati et al, 1995; Corp et al, 2003; Long & Bernacchi, 2003; van der Tol et al, 2009); however, it is less clear whether the signal seen by coarse satellite observations over longer term period (several days) reflects mainly changes in LUE. Indeed, it appears that most of the variability of the SIF signal at the ecosystem might be explained by APAR Ch , that is, the product of fPAR Ch and PAR, thus reflecting changes in canopy structure and light absorption (Badgley et al, 2017; Li et al, 2017), at least for the far‐red signal (Du et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, biomes with lower SiF-GPP slopes have also lower correlation and in general this happens at higher LAI values, which should be investigated further. Analysing differences in the SiF-GPP relationships for different biomes requires advanced canopy and SiF modelling using radiative transfer models such as SCOPE [44,75]. By applying models, scalerelated issues can be identified and separated from biophysical factors.…”
Section: Comparing Far-red Sif With Gpp Derived From Australian Flux mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological relationships between SiF and GPP have been described in the literature (e.g., [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]). SiF is one of many quenching mechanisms that plants use to release excess energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%