2005
DOI: 10.1080/14034940510005789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for cost-effectiveness analyses of smoking cessation interventions applied to a Quit-and-Win contest for mothers of small children

Abstract: The cost-utility analysis estimated health gains and cost savings resulting from the "Quit-and-Win" contest. As the model estimates on the differences in societal cost between smokers and quitters are considerable, many tobacco control programmes would result in cost savings. The construction of an optimal mix of tobacco control policies, however, demands incremental calculations on a range of programmes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the cost per life year saved via tobacco dependence treatment has been estimated at $3,539 (Cromwell et al, 1997), which compares favorably to hypertension screening for men, ages 45–54 ($5,200), and annual cervical screening for women, ages 34–39 ($4,100; Tengs et al, 1995). In addition, tobacco dependence treatment compares quite favorably, on the basis of quality adjusted life years saved, with other treatments such as those for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia as well as with preventive screening (e.g., mammography, Pap smears; Brandon et al, 2004; Chirikos, Herzog, Meade, Webb, & Brandon, 2004; Croghan et al, 1997; Feenstra, Hamberg-van Reenen, Hoogenveen, & Rutten-van Molken, 2005; Johansson, Tillgren, Guldbrandsson, & Lindholm, 2005; Parrott&Godfrey, 2004; Raw, McNeill,&Coleman, 2005; Solberg et al, 2006; Stapleton, Lowin, & Russell, 1999). …”
Section: Merits Of Psychosocial Interventions and Future Prospects Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the cost per life year saved via tobacco dependence treatment has been estimated at $3,539 (Cromwell et al, 1997), which compares favorably to hypertension screening for men, ages 45–54 ($5,200), and annual cervical screening for women, ages 34–39 ($4,100; Tengs et al, 1995). In addition, tobacco dependence treatment compares quite favorably, on the basis of quality adjusted life years saved, with other treatments such as those for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia as well as with preventive screening (e.g., mammography, Pap smears; Brandon et al, 2004; Chirikos, Herzog, Meade, Webb, & Brandon, 2004; Croghan et al, 1997; Feenstra, Hamberg-van Reenen, Hoogenveen, & Rutten-van Molken, 2005; Johansson, Tillgren, Guldbrandsson, & Lindholm, 2005; Parrott&Godfrey, 2004; Raw, McNeill,&Coleman, 2005; Solberg et al, 2006; Stapleton, Lowin, & Russell, 1999). …”
Section: Merits Of Psychosocial Interventions and Future Prospects Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researchers intended that the HECOS model would be widely accessible and modifiable for application to other countries, but the version we sourced could not be adapted to provide the analyses we needed. Johansson and colleagues developed a similar model to predict the health and economic consequences of smoking cessation in Sweden, [7] but it is not available for adaptation to other settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Unlike for all pharmacologic therapies for COPD, the cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation on a population basis has been rigorously evaluated and found to be cost-effective to costsaving over time. [6][7][8][9] We examined whether smoking status and the duration of abstinence from tobacco smoke were associated with a decreased risk of COPD exacerbations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%