2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for deformation and fragmentation in crushable brittle solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, adiabatic shear banding, plugging, and/or petal formation in metallic targets (often thin) reported for other armor systems [14,[31][32][33][34][35] are not of primary interest in the present case. Plasticity, fracture, and solid-solid phase transitions are appropriately addressed here for aluminum nitride, but mechanisms prevalent in other brittle targets not relevant here include pore collapse, for example, in concrete targets [34,36] or impacted rocks and minerals [37,38] and stress-induced amorphization, as observed in boron carbide [38,39] and quartz [40]. For these different classes of targets not considered herein or in [1], appropriate constitutive models should always be chosen or constructed to represent dominant failure mechanisms observed in corresponding experiments.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, adiabatic shear banding, plugging, and/or petal formation in metallic targets (often thin) reported for other armor systems [14,[31][32][33][34][35] are not of primary interest in the present case. Plasticity, fracture, and solid-solid phase transitions are appropriately addressed here for aluminum nitride, but mechanisms prevalent in other brittle targets not relevant here include pore collapse, for example, in concrete targets [34,36] or impacted rocks and minerals [37,38] and stress-induced amorphization, as observed in boron carbide [38,39] and quartz [40]. For these different classes of targets not considered herein or in [1], appropriate constitutive models should always be chosen or constructed to represent dominant failure mechanisms observed in corresponding experiments.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because in applications of present interest, slip takes place before large deviatoric elastic strains can arise, third-order elastic constants in (5) are represented by the simple form [5,7] …”
Section: Model For Anisotropic Crystal Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice from (46) and the preceding discussion that bulk modulus K and the higher-order elastic coefficient K 1 remain constant under compressive hydrostatic loading. If the bulk modulus exhibits an increase as the initial porosity is compressed out of the material (i.e., as open tensile cracks become fully closed above some threshold pressure (Brace et al 1966)), a more detailed equation of state coupling porosity and effective bulk modulus may be necessary, as is the case for concrete with substantial initial porosity (Clayton 2008). In the present application, any initial mode I cracks are approximated either as stationary or fully closed; that is, all effects of initial porosity are included implicitly in the choice of K and K 1 .…”
Section: Thermoelasticity With Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models based on continuum damage mechanics concepts and employing scalar variables accounting for evolving crack densities include, for example, those of Holcomb (1978), Moss and Gupta (1982), Margolin (1984), Rajendran (1994), Ai and Ahrens (2006), Clayton (2008) and Paliwal and Ramesh (2008). Models accounting for potentially large deformations resulting from micro-crack opening on discrete failure planes include representative theories of Zienkiewicz and Pande (1977), Espinosa et al (1998) and Bazant et al (2000a,b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation