A model for designing action learning and action research programs

Abstract

Models can be helpful for understanding the essence and/or processes of complex phenomena in a field, because they are simple representations of concept patterns and relationships. This paper presents a generic model for designing action learning programs, including action research projects, within organizations. Core values for action learning programs and explanations for success and potential pitfalls are also discussed. The model has been tested and found useful by many senior managers, academics, postgraduates and consultants in several countries. Readers are encouraged to explore the model in order to apply, refine, adapt it, or to create their own model representing their theoretical framework, concepts, values and systems thinking.

Improving teaching and learning of computer programming through the use of the Second Life virtual world

“…AR is a cyclical process that incorporates the four-step processes of 626 planning, acting, observing and reflecting on the results generated from a particular project or body of work (Dick, 1999;Zuber-Skerritt, 2002). This choice was made in view of the two main advantages of AR (Zuber-Skerritt).…”

“…When there is not enough research literature on the field of study, as in this case, it is necessary, before the first research cycle, to make a preliminary exploratory experience in order to identify the basic problems and feed the first planning (Lessard-Hébert, Goyette & Boutin, 1990). The research process is never completed, but a plateau is reached when the reflection at the end of a cycle deems that the amount of collected knowledge on the process is significant (Zuber-Skerritt, 2002).…”

Action Learning and Action Research (ALAR): A Methodological Integration in an Inter-Organizational Setting

“…Using action learning and action research together in an integrated manner under the acronym, ALAR, has been developing for over 20 years together (Sankaran et al 2001;Swepson et al 2003;Zuber-Skerritt 2003;Middel et al 2005;Coghlan and Coughlan 2006). Separately, within their own heritages and frames of reference they are both wellestablished in terms of extensive literature, methodology and proven research track records.…”

Adaptation options for marine industries and coastal communities using community structure and dynamics

“…For example, simple flow diagrams or mind maps can be beneficial in ensuring information from various sources can be incorporated into assessments and provide stakeholders with an holistic 580 view of the system (Zuber-Skerritt 2002). Any technique that allows visualisation and discussion, and easily incorporates differences of opinion and knowledge can be particularly useful for encouraging knowledge sharing and learning.…”