IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 2004. Proceedings.
DOI: 10.1109/icalt.2004.1357374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for evaluating learning objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The factors that determine the reusability of a learning object (Palmer and Richardson 2004;Daniel and Mohan 2004;Huddlestone and Pike 2005;Pitkanen and Silander 2004) can be classified as structural or contextual issues. From a structural viewpoint, reusable learning objects must be as following:…”
Section: The Relationship Between Reusability and The Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors that determine the reusability of a learning object (Palmer and Richardson 2004;Daniel and Mohan 2004;Huddlestone and Pike 2005;Pitkanen and Silander 2004) can be classified as structural or contextual issues. From a structural viewpoint, reusable learning objects must be as following:…”
Section: The Relationship Between Reusability and The Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe this perspective is informative, and provides new potential to realising learning objectives in the context of collaborative work, personalised and autonomous learning. Furthermore, the proposed model is expected to contribute to qualitatively greater learning outcomes and consequently a better return-on-investment [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been suggested that successful design of learning objects (LOs) necessitates incorporation of instructional design and learning theories with current LO design methodologies [4,8]. This requirement is symptomatic of many computer-mediated activities in which developers of learning systems are confronted with an emerging "socio-technical" gap, or the separation of tasks which are able to be supported technically from those which can be supported socially [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REUSABILITY FACTORS The factors that determine the ability of a learning object to be reused [6] [7][8] can be classified as structural or contextual issues. From a structural viewpoint, reusable learning objects must be:…”
Section: Evaluation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%