2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2003.11.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for Fermi-level pinning in semiconductors: radiation defects, interface boundaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A feature of the InAs semiconductor is that radiation defects shift the Fermi level toward the conduction band, which leads to an increase of the carrier concentration in the n-type material or the p-n type conversion in p-InAs (Ref. [18]). …”
Section: Gaasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A feature of the InAs semiconductor is that radiation defects shift the Fermi level toward the conduction band, which leads to an increase of the carrier concentration in the n-type material or the p-n type conversion in p-InAs (Ref. [18]). …”
Section: Gaasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown that within the whole range of the w-Al x Ga 1-x N compositions, the CNL is located in the upper half of the band gap, which results in the n-type conductivity of this material upon exposure to high-energy radiation.The concept of local charge electroneutrality (the "neutral" point) is widely used for analyzing energy-level diagrams of unstressed interfaces, estimating electrophysical characteristics of defect semiconductors, and calculating equilibrium levels of doping materials by chemical impurities [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. The charge electroneutrality level acts as a fundamental crystal parameter identical for all isotype semiconductors with similar type of chemical bonds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These show that if the radiation-induced defects are introduced into InSb, the Fermi level is shifted to a position in the lower part of the band gap corresponding to the charge neutrality level of the crystal defect states (E cnl ) [12], to the level of a local amphoteric defect (E lnl ) [12], to the midgap between the conduction and valence bands of the crystal averaged over the first Brillouin zone (<E G >/2) [12], and to the level of the deepest crystal defect (E dl ) in the energy range in the vicinity of its band gap [13]. The calculated values of E g , E cnl , E lnl , E dl , and <E G >/2 in InSb shown in Table 2 qualitatively support this assumption despite their wide scatter caused by the narrow InSb band gap and stringent requirements on the accuracy of calculations.…”
Section: Before Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 and Figures 1 and 2 show the electrophysical parameters of the InSb microcrystals measured before and after irradiation by various integral electron flows. It is seen that the high-temperature (Т ≈ 300 К) irradiation of n-InSb by 13 MeV electrons results in a decrease in the free-electron concentration and mobility within the whole range of initial doping levels under study. In so doing, the efficiency of radiation-induced acceptors increases with increasing the initial …”
mentioning
confidence: 94%