Digital Mammography 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-59327-7_59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for nonrigid mammogram registration using mutual information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Control points were located randomly [25], manually [81], or automatically from edge features [70] or the breast contour [145]. The mapping functions reported include elastic body splines (EBS) [25], which evolved from the description of the equilibrium displacements of homogeneous isotropic elastic material subjected to a load, and TPS [145].…”
Section: Registration Of Mr Mammogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control points were located randomly [25], manually [81], or automatically from edge features [70] or the breast contour [145]. The mapping functions reported include elastic body splines (EBS) [25], which evolved from the description of the equilibrium displacements of homogeneous isotropic elastic material subjected to a load, and TPS [145].…”
Section: Registration Of Mr Mammogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its primary use is for registration, typically using affine transforms. [18] and [20], among others, use maximization of mutual information for nonrigid registration. They represent nonrigid registration using thin-plate splines, which do not preserve discontinuity.…”
Section: Mutual Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiologists also regularly compare bilateral mammogram pairs during screening in search for breast asymmetry. The mostly used computer based techniques of bilateral comparison include thin-plate spline transformation and wavelet transformation [4,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%