2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.02.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for predicting salt equilibria in milk and mineral-enriched milks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
60
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although no significant differences in Ca content were found in this particular study, this data is generally consistent with what has been previously reported concerning the effect of mineral addition on the Ca system in milk (Dalgleish and Parker, 1980, Dickson and Perkins, 1971, Horne, 1998. According to the previously established work, as well as work which attempts to model ionic calcium as a function of ionic strength (Mekmene et al, 2009), as ionic strength of the milk solution increases, a larger percentage of total calcium will be found in the ionic phase. Ionic-phase minerals are then able to be removed by the UF/DF processes, which should lead to an overall lower level of Ca in the final UF/DF product.…”
Section: Mineral Content Of Skim Milk Uf and Df Products On Wet Basissupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although no significant differences in Ca content were found in this particular study, this data is generally consistent with what has been previously reported concerning the effect of mineral addition on the Ca system in milk (Dalgleish and Parker, 1980, Dickson and Perkins, 1971, Horne, 1998. According to the previously established work, as well as work which attempts to model ionic calcium as a function of ionic strength (Mekmene et al, 2009), as ionic strength of the milk solution increases, a larger percentage of total calcium will be found in the ionic phase. Ionic-phase minerals are then able to be removed by the UF/DF processes, which should lead to an overall lower level of Ca in the final UF/DF product.…”
Section: Mineral Content Of Skim Milk Uf and Df Products On Wet Basissupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Milk contains roughly 130 mg/L Mg, and of that amount roughly 33 % is found in the colloidal phase (Fox, 1989); yet, this association may shift as minerals are added to the milk system and overall ionic strength of the milk system increases (Walstra et al, 2006). The observation that treatment level 1 had a significantly larger increase in Mg between UF and DF than treatment level 4 is generally consistent with previous observations relating an increase in ionic strength to increased solubility of milk salts (Mekmene et al, 2009). At α = 0.01, there is a statistically significant difference in the difference in K content due to process (p < 0.001).…”
Section: Mineral Content Of Skim Milk Uf and Df Products On Wet Basissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A commercially available program uses a more empirical approach without explicitly allowing for the protein equilibria (Mekmene et al, 2009(Mekmene et al, , 2010. The principal environmental factors affecting these equilibria are temperature, pressure, pH, and ionic strength, and these can produce effects that are reversible, slow to reverse, or effectively irreversible.…”
Section: Environmental Effects On the Partition Of Milk Saltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ca is present in the casein micelle as two components: CCP and Ca directly bound to phosphoserine residues [24]. Due to different association constants of Ca for organic phosphate (P o ) and P i and to the low solubility of Ca inorganic phosphate salts, Ca in milk is present 1/3 in the soluble phase of milk, 1/6 bound to the phosphoserines and 1/2 in CCP [29]. According to Le Graët and Brulé [24], acidification to pH 5.2 as performed in [27] solubilises mainly CCP, probably as did Ca chelatants, but Odagiri and Nickerson [30] reported that EDTA could make both forms of micellar Ca diffusible, while with citrate addition only CCP becomes diffusible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Le Graët and Brulé [24], acidification to pH 5.2 as performed in [27] solubilises mainly CCP, probably as did Ca chelatants, but Odagiri and Nickerson [30] reported that EDTA could make both forms of micellar Ca diffusible, while with citrate addition only CCP becomes diffusible. For example, calculations according to Mekmene et al [29] show that addition of trisodium citrate at 10 and 20 mmol·L −1 lead to a reduction in Ca as CCP of 50% and 98%, respectively, but also to a reduction in phosphoserine-bound Ca of 5% and 11%. Citrate is less efficient in Ca solubilisation than EDTA, due to weaker chelating properties [29,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%