The Mechanical Behavior of Salt – Understanding of THMC Processes in Salt 2017
DOI: 10.1201/9781315106502-13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for rock salt, describing transient, stationary, and accelerated creep and dilatancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of constitutive models of rock salt has been proposed in the past for different applications based on experimental and theoretical studies . Lubby2 and Minkley are constitutive models composed of Burgers models extended by nonlinear stress‐dependent viscosities, and, in the case of Minkley, dilatancy boundaries .…”
Section: Constitutive Models Of Rock Saltmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A variety of constitutive models of rock salt has been proposed in the past for different applications based on experimental and theoretical studies . Lubby2 and Minkley are constitutive models composed of Burgers models extended by nonlinear stress‐dependent viscosities, and, in the case of Minkley, dilatancy boundaries .…”
Section: Constitutive Models Of Rock Saltmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The cohesion can evolve according to linear and non‐linear hardening/softening laws . Here, we considered only simple linear hardening in the early stages of plastic deformation as follows: c=c0()1+H1ϵPeff, where c is cohesion, c0 is initial cohesion, and H1 is first‐order harding coefficient.…”
Section: Constitutive Models Of Rock Saltmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The material models and the parameters of the different geological layers are given in Table 2. These models and the fitting parameters based on rock-mechanics laboratory tests [3,13] are used by all benchmark participants.…”
Section: Behaviour Of Other Rock Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%