1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1996.tb07034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for sedimentary compaction of a viscous medium and its application to inner-core growth

Abstract: S U M M A R YA detailed study of the physics of a 1-D sedimentary compaction of a viscous medium was carried out both numerically and analytically for columnar and self-gravitating spherical cases, in view of applying it to the inner-core growth process of the Earth. The effects of sedimentation rate and surface porosity upon the porosity profile were investigated. It was found that the porosity profile differs depending on whether or not the sedimentation rate is larger than the Darcy velocity (velocity of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
89
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to most earlier studies that neglected the porosity dependence of the bulk viscosity, i.e., by explicitly or implicitly taking m = 0 in equation (12), we consider the case m = 1. This choice is theoretically justified in the small porosity limit [Nye, 1953;Sumita et al, 1996], is consistent with both experimental [Ashby, 1988;Renner et al, 2003] and natural [Connolly and Podladchikov, 2000] compaction profiles, and precludes unrealistic behavior such as negative porosity Podladchikov, 1998, 2000].…”
Section: Constitutive Relations and Nondimensionalizationsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to most earlier studies that neglected the porosity dependence of the bulk viscosity, i.e., by explicitly or implicitly taking m = 0 in equation (12), we consider the case m = 1. This choice is theoretically justified in the small porosity limit [Nye, 1953;Sumita et al, 1996], is consistent with both experimental [Ashby, 1988;Renner et al, 2003] and natural [Connolly and Podladchikov, 2000] compaction profiles, and precludes unrealistic behavior such as negative porosity Podladchikov, 1998, 2000].…”
Section: Constitutive Relations and Nondimensionalizationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Theory [Nye, 1953;Sumita et al, 1996] and both field [Connolly and Podladchikov, 2000] and experimental [Ashby, 1988;Renner et al, 2003] observations support the contention that z / 1/f, yielding a logarithmic relationship between amplitude and speed (equation (26)). Given the asthenospheric compaction timescale (t*(y) $ 6 ffiffiffi m p /f 0 , Table 1), melt extraction at porosities <10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative explanation, which we cannot completely rule out, involves time-varying topography, which could be due to dynamic processes related to inner-core growth (24). In this scenario, the viscosity at the top of the inner core would need to be Ͻ10 16 Pa (4) to allow time variability on the time scale of a decade.…”
Section: Data Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments with metal alloys (Jack- The form of compositional convection that takes place in the ICB transition region depends partially on processes that are not modeled in these and other laboratory experiments. The process of compaction has been applied to inner core growth by Sumita et al (1996). Deformation of the solid mush occurs due to stresses that arise from the density difference between solid and liquid in the mush.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%