2012
DOI: 10.1002/pits.21607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for system‐wide collaboration to support integrated social behavior and literacy evidence‐based practices

Abstract: In the face of dwindling financial resources, educational leaders are looking to refine resource allocation while maintaining a focus on improved student outcomes. This article presents initial findings from a professional development state initiative called Effective Behavioral and Instructional Support Systems (EBISS). The EBISS initiative aims to teach practicing educators about two evidence‐based systems of practice and how to blend those practices for more efficient and effective school systems. The targe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some articles focus on SWPBIS at the far end of this efficacy‐effectiveness‐implementation continuum, these often include other limitations. Chaparro, Smolkowski, Baker, Hanson, and Ryan‐Jackson (; see also Chaparro, Ryan‐Jackson, Baker, & Smolkowski, ) described a state‐funded professional development program that targeted both SWPBIS and a school‐wide reading model. Chaparro, Smolkowski et al., however, examined only elementary schools and limited data on student behavior or implementation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some articles focus on SWPBIS at the far end of this efficacy‐effectiveness‐implementation continuum, these often include other limitations. Chaparro, Smolkowski, Baker, Hanson, and Ryan‐Jackson (; see also Chaparro, Ryan‐Jackson, Baker, & Smolkowski, ) described a state‐funded professional development program that targeted both SWPBIS and a school‐wide reading model. Chaparro, Smolkowski et al., however, examined only elementary schools and limited data on student behavior or implementation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…학교는 위기학생의 예방부터 고위기 학생을 위한 강도 높은 지원까지 가능할 수 있도록 일 상적인 위기학생 예방 및 지원 체제로 다층지원체제를 고려할 수 있다. 다층지원체제에서는 학 생의 요구에 반응하여 점차 강도 높은 중재를 제공하고자 중재의 층이 구성되어 있으며 위기학 생의 학업 및 행동의 두 가지 영역에서 그 성과가 증명되고 있다 (Chaparro, et al, 2012;Farkas et al, 2012;Little et al, 2010). 우리나라의 Wee프로젝트는 정신보건, 사회복지 서비스 등이 포함된 랩 어라운드 절차 (Eber et al, 2009;Eber, et al, 2002)와 유사한 포괄적이며 다학제적 접근으로 고위기 학생 지원에 매우 중요하다.…”
Section: 학교 기반 위기학생 예방 및 지원 체제는 다층지원체제 형식을 갖추는 것이 필요하다unclassified
“…Within the last 10 years, several evaluation studies of SWPBS relative to the prevention of aggressive and antisocial behavior problems that are common among students at high risk for EBD have been completed (Benedict, Horner, & Squires, 2007; Farkas et al, 2012). Additionally, recent studies have examined the integration of social behavioral and academic support systems in an attempt to provide for students who experience comorbid challenges across these domains (Chaparro, Smolkowski, Baker, Hanson, & Ryan-Jackson, 2012). Other studies have analyzed the contextual features needed to support implementation over time in typical school settings (Barrett, Bradshaw, & Lewis-Palmer, 2008; Muscott, Mann, & LeBrun, 2008; Simonsen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Critical Features Of Swpbsmentioning
confidence: 99%