A Model for the Development of Sustainable Innovations for the Early Phase of the Innovation Process

Stock, Tim; Obenaus, Michael; Slaymaker, Amara; Seliger, Günther

doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.027

Cited by 35 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The project work of the students is divided in presence phases at the partner universities of one-week each and in phases for online collaboration. A so-called diamond model for the development of innovations in start-ups (Stock et al, 2017) provides the work structure and important work phases for the students. Additionally, the project work is supplemented by online lectures which provide the required know-how in the field of sustainable engineering (Figure 1).…”

Section: Concept Of the Master Coursementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Sustainable engineering master module – insights from three cohorts of European engineering team

Gładysz

Urgo

Stock

et al. 2020

IJSM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mobility and transnational migration are current social developments among the population of the European Union. These developments in both society-at-large and companies, linked to the challenges of sustainability, lead to new requirements for working in the European Union. Teaching and learning in higher education needs to adapt to these requirements. As a result, new and innovative teaching and learning practices in higher education should provide competencies for transnational teamwork in the curriculum of tomorrow's engineers in order to ensure their competitiveness in the job market. A transnational project-oriented teaching and learning framework, which provides the future key competencies for young engineers was implemented in the course European Engineering Team (EET). Engineering students from four countries participated in a new project-based course that focused on the development of innovative and sustainable products and opportunities. The goal of this paper is to present results and lessons learnt from three cohorts of EET.

show abstract

Section: Concept Of the Master Coursementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The pallet system is customisable and adaptable to the customers' needs and allows multiple use phases. The product and business model development followed the methodology of the diamond-model (Stock et al, 2017). In terms of the product development, only the mechanical domain was relevant for the development of the Anchora pallet system.…”

Section: Cohortmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable engineering master module – insights from three cohorts of European engineering team

Gładysz

Urgo

Stock

et al. 2020

IJSM

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Changes should be implemented with respect to an organization's philosophy, values, and "corporate culture" (Adams et al, 2016). Methods for early phases in the innovation phase have been proposed by various authors (Hallstedt et al, 2013;Hansen et al, 2009;Lang-Koetz et al, 2008;Schimpf & Binzer, 2012;Stock et al, 2017), most of which are presented as concepts, and only partially accompanied by demonstrations of practical application. Moreover, they focus on application inside a company.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated Innovation and Sustainability Analysis for New Technologies: An approach for collaborative R&D projects

Gasde¹,

Preiß²,

Lang‐Koetz³

2020

TIM Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the same paper Tim Stock defines innovation as a multi-stage process, and creativity, motivation and knowledge are the main factors leading to the first phase of innovation. [2]. The literature presents various studies that measure the innovation performance in Romania.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of supporting indicators for innovation in Romania compared to neighboring EU countries

Bungău

Cosmin

2018

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper presents a comparative study of indicators which targeting the facilities and support for the innovation process. The study targets indicators regarding human resources, support structure / infrastructure and legislative provisions. The analysis is carried out over the last 5 years, comparing the indicators in Romania and the neighboring countries (Bulgaria, Hungary, Austria, Slovakia and Poland) and highly developed countries (Germany and France). Based on this study, will be drawing conclusions for improvement of these indicators. The indicators that will be taken into consideration are: Availability of scientists and engineers, Researchers, Quality of the education system, Researchers in Research and Development, Research and development expenditure, Firm-level technology absorption, University-industry collaboration in Research & Development, Quality of scientific research institutions, Gross domestic spending on Research and Development, Property rights, Intellectual property protection.

show abstract

A Model for the Development of Sustainable Innovations for the Early Phase of the Innovation Process

Cited by 35 publications

References 14 publications

Sustainable engineering master module – insights from three cohorts of European engineering team

Sustainable engineering master module – insights from three cohorts of European engineering team

Integrated Innovation and Sustainability Analysis for New Technologies: An approach for collaborative R&D projects

Analysis of supporting indicators for innovation in Romania compared to neighboring EU countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About