2005
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-2768-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model for the MHD Turbulence in the Earth’s Plasma Sheet: Building Computer Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine the necessary elongation of the simulation volume in the z direction, we consider the correlation length of the velocity field in each direction. We measure a correlation length of the velocity field in the z direction, L c,|| , that is larger than in the x and y directions, in agreement with previous studies, (e.g., Boldyrev, 2005;Chandran, 2008;Cho et al, 2002). To accommodate this larger L c,|| within our simulation volume, we elongate the simulation volume in the z direction, so that the condition on the box length in the z direction L z ≫ L c,|| is satisfied.…”
Section: Direct Numerical Simulations For Lagrangian Single-particle Diffusion and Two-particle Dispersionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the necessary elongation of the simulation volume in the z direction, we consider the correlation length of the velocity field in each direction. We measure a correlation length of the velocity field in the z direction, L c,|| , that is larger than in the x and y directions, in agreement with previous studies, (e.g., Boldyrev, 2005;Chandran, 2008;Cho et al, 2002). To accommodate this larger L c,|| within our simulation volume, we elongate the simulation volume in the z direction, so that the condition on the box length in the z direction L z ≫ L c,|| is satisfied.…”
Section: Direct Numerical Simulations For Lagrangian Single-particle Diffusion and Two-particle Dispersionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In the solar wind, ion foreshock, and magnetosheath, ranges have been reported such that the macroscopic magnetic field is between 1 and 2.5 times the RMS fluctuations (Zimbardo et al, 2010). In Earth's plasma sheet the macroscopic magnetic field is on the order of two times the RMS fluctuations of the turbulent magnetic field ( B02Bsans-serifRsans-serifMsans-serifS) (Borovsky, 2005). In the magnetotail, observational data indicate that the magnetic field is stronger, between three and five times the RMS fluctuations (see Table 1 of Zimbardo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fluid dynamics, all high‐Reynolds‐number flows are turbulent [ Schlichtng , 1979; Novopashin and Muriel , 2002; Ben‐Dov and Cohen , 2007]. Determining the Reynolds number of a plasma flow in the magnetosphere is complicated owing to electrodynamic coupling of the plasma to the ionosphere, which can act at a distance on magnetospheric flows in addition to internal “fluid” processes [ Borovsky and Funsten , 2003; Borovsky , 2004]. Treating the internal fluid processes first, the Reynolds number of the drainage‐plume flow is estimated as follows.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence of turbulence in the Earth's magnetosphere has been found by various spacecraft observations (Nykyri et al, 2006;Sundkvist et al, 2005;Zimbardo et al, 2008), and several authors have studied magnetospheric MHD turbulence (see, e.g., Borovsky, 2004;Hwang et al, 2011;El-Alaoui et al, 2012). However, given the large number of degrees of freedom, simulation of turbulent systems has a large computational cost, which has led to the development of analytical models, which, while sharing statistical properties of the systems under study, depend only on a few degrees of freedom (Chapman et al, 1998;Valdivia et al, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%