1974
DOI: 10.1037/h0037149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model for visual shape recognition.

Abstract: Many examples of stimulus equivalence may be explained by angle and length-ratio feature detectors whose outputs are generalized over the visual field. Problems of interference between a number of figures simultaneously present and of localizing the figure that is being recognized require a mechanism of selective attention. This could involve the temporal segregation of signals from different figures as they pass through the recognition circuits. The figure to which attention is directed feeds a signal back to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
301
2
3

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 542 publications
(313 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
301
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…From this we conclude that time-varying changes within spatially coherent features produce more salient neural signals (15), although it remains to be learned just what constitutes ''spatial coherence'' for purposes of this task. Our conclusion is consistent with models of binding in which extrinsically activated neural mechanisms resonate to spatio-temporal coherence among local features comprising a global object or event (6,10). It has also been proposed that visual features lacking externally imposed temporal structure can be grouped by virtue of internal generation of synchronized activity (22,23), although that idea is controversial (24, 25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this we conclude that time-varying changes within spatially coherent features produce more salient neural signals (15), although it remains to be learned just what constitutes ''spatial coherence'' for purposes of this task. Our conclusion is consistent with models of binding in which extrinsically activated neural mechanisms resonate to spatio-temporal coherence among local features comprising a global object or event (6,10). It has also been proposed that visual features lacking externally imposed temporal structure can be grouped by virtue of internal generation of synchronized activity (22,23), although that idea is controversial (24, 25).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Yet we perceive objects whose constituent features are, at least metaphorically speaking, bound together coherently. One popular but controversial hypothesis posits as a binding agent temporal synchronization of neural activity among cortical cells registering object features (6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). In experiments reported here, we have discovered that synchronized modulations over time in the contrast of separate components of complex images are easier to detect when those components form a meaningful object.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that this type of temporal synchronization (Milner, 1974;von der Malsburg & Schneider, 1986) could not be detected in any single-neuron spike train but only in multi-unit recordings of neurons inside and outside the focus of attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One suggestion was ± based on theoretical considerations and ®ndings in intracortical recordings in animals ± that the object is coded in a Hebbian-like neuronal cell assembly which is distributed across different functional visual areas by means of synchronized bursts of action potentials in a frequency range above 20 Hz, i.e. the gamma band (Milner, 1974;Malsburg and Schneider, 1986;Eckhorn et al, 1990;Gray et al, 1990;Singer et al, 1990;Eckhorn et al, 1992;Singer and Gray, 1995). Contrary to the above mentioned VEPs, these synchronized oscillations are neither phase-nor time-locked to stimulus onset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%