1994
DOI: 10.1016/0927-6505(94)90026-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model independent approach to future solar neutrino experiments

Abstract: In the first part of this report we present the results of a model independent analysis of the existing solar neutrino data. We obtained forbidden regions in the plane of the parameters ∆m 2 and sin 2 2θ in two cases: A) Without any restrictions on the values of the solar neutrino fluxes from different reactions; B) With some restrictions that take into account the predictions of all the existing solar models. We show that the existing solar neutrino data allow to exclude rather large regions in the plane of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MSW solutions in Fig. 3 compare well with the most recent two-generation analyses of the solar neutrino problem [22,23,[33][34][35][36][37][38], modulo small differences due to the input data and their treatment. In particular, we have verified that, excluding the earth regeneration effect, our results become very similar to those obtained very recently by Bahcall and Krastev in [38], where the same solar model and experimental data were used as input.…”
Section: B Two-generation Msw Analysissupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The MSW solutions in Fig. 3 compare well with the most recent two-generation analyses of the solar neutrino problem [22,23,[33][34][35][36][37][38], modulo small differences due to the input data and their treatment. In particular, we have verified that, excluding the earth regeneration effect, our results become very similar to those obtained very recently by Bahcall and Krastev in [38], where the same solar model and experimental data were used as input.…”
Section: B Two-generation Msw Analysissupporting
confidence: 70%
“…( 9). Since the 14 N(p; ) 15 O reaction is the slowest process in the CNO cycle, one must also have 15 O 13 N : (10) The luminosity constraint sets upper bounds on the allowed neutrino uxes. Since somewhat di erent amounts of energy release are associated with each of the neutrino uxes, the upper bounds depend somewhat upon the neutrino branch being considered.…”
Section: The Luminosity Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NC rate (15) then does not depend on the ν e survival neutrino probability P (E), and one therefore expects R N C in the case of neutrinos undergoing RSFP to coincide with that for standard neutrinos R st N C [25,16]. Notice that for µ ν < ∼ 10 −11 µ B the electromagnetic contribution to the NC neutrino-deuteron disintegration reaction (10) due to the neutrino magnetic moment is more than eight orders of magnitude smaller than the standard electroweak one [26] and so can be safely neglected.…”
Section: Solar Magnetic Field Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such time dependence should be manifest in the CC reaction rate and electron spectrum, but should not be observable in the NC rate provided that neutrinos are Majorana particles [25,16]. In particular, the CC signal can have an 11-year periodicity related to the solar activity cycle [23].…”
Section: Solar Magnetic Field Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation