A Model of Agenda Dynamics

Manheim, Jarol B.

doi:10.1080/23808985.1987.11678659

Cited by 32 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In general, the data show that few distinctions are apparent in terms of salience between content located in prominent areas of the newspaper and content located throughout the entire newspaper. The evidence supports Manheim's (1986) dimension of visibility (attention and prominence), but more research is needed to replicate the present study's findings. Nonetheless, this finding suggests that the conventional use of story frequency to represent media salience has been generally appropriate.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 57%

“…Although the concentration on salience resonates throughout the literature, few inquiries have formally explicated the concept. For those that have, the tendency has been to touch on aspects of public salience (e.g., Evatt, 1997;Evatt & Ghanem, 2001) or the broader concept of agendas themselves (e.g., Manheim, 1986). Few studies have exclusively converged on agenda setting's key independent variable: media salience.…”

Section: By Spiro Kiousismentioning

confidence: 97%

“…This is different from the attention dimension because placement and position rather than volume are the most paramount characteristics. Manheim (1986) collapsed attention and prominence into the category of visibility, but some literature seems to suggest differences between them. For example, Watts, Mazz, and Snyder (1993) argued that [C]overage prominence measures are superior to story counts because they acknowledge structural and presentational elements of the news story.…”

Section: Media Salience In Agenda Settingmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…For example, Manheim (1986) explicitly declared that valence is a central dimension of the media agenda. Furthermore, Mutz (1998) conveyed that the conventional question scrutinizing public salience ("what is the most important problem facing the nation today?")…”

Section: Media Salience In Agenda Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, Manheim (1986) identified three dimensions of the media agenda: visibility, audience salience, and valence. By adopting the internal-external dichotomy introduced above, we see both external (e.g., social and visibility) and internal (e.g., need and valence) aspects in these definitions.…”

Section: General Views Of Saliencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Explicating Media Salience: A Factor Analysis of New York Times Issue Coverage During the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election

Kiousis

2004

Journal of Communication

237

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Media salience-the key independent variable in agenda-setting research-has traditionally been explicated as a singular construct. Nevertheless, scholars have defined and measured it using a number of different conceptualizations and empirical indicators. To address this limitation in research, this study introduced a conceptual model of media salience, suggesting it is a multidimensional construct consisting of 3 core elements: attention, prominence, and valence. Furthermore, the model was tested through an exploratory factor analysis of The New York Times news coverage of 8 major political issues during the 2000 presidential election as a case study. The data revealed that 2 dimensions of media salience emerge: visibility and valence. Based on the factor analysis, 2 indices are created to measure the construct, which are intended for use in future investigations.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 57%

Section: By Spiro Kiousismentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Media Salience In Agenda Settingmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Media Salience In Agenda Settingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: General Views Of Saliencementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Explicating Media Salience: A Factor Analysis of New York Times Issue Coverage During the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election

Kiousis

2004

Journal of Communication

237

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effects of greenwashing on financial performance: Moderation through local environmental regulation and media coverage

Seppänen

et al. 2022

Bus Strat Env

131

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent research suggests that the effect of greenwashing and corporate financial performance (CFP) is ambiguous. This call for study the contextual factors that create contingencies in the greenwashing–CFP relationship. Using a sample of 2816 observations covering 735 Chinese‐listed firms in 21 different industries from 2013 to 2017, this research examines the effect of greenwashing on CFP and explores the moderating effects of local environmental regulation, media visibility and media favourability. Results show that greenwashing positively affects CFP and effect weakened with stringent environmental regulations and reversed with low media favourability. Our finding implies that stakeholders could hardly identify greenwashing in the context of an emerging economy with high‐level information asymmetry. However, local environmental regulation and negative media coverage could reduce this information asymmetry, making greenwashing easier to be identified. It is the first study to investigate greenwashing–CFP relationship from institutional environment perspective.

show abstract

Literatur

Schulz¹

1997

Politische Kommunikation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Model of Agenda Dynamics

Cited by 32 publications

References 1 publication

Explicating Media Salience: A Factor Analysis of New York Times Issue Coverage During the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election

Explicating Media Salience: A Factor Analysis of New York Times Issue Coverage During the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election

Effects of greenwashing on financial performance: Moderation through local environmental regulation and media coverage

Literatur

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About