2015
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2015.0987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Collective Interpretation

Abstract: W e propose a cognitively plausible formal model of collective interpretation. The model represents how members of a collective interact to interpret their environment. Current theories of collective interpretation focus on how heedful communication among members of a collective (i.e., how much individuals pay attention to others' interpretations) improves interpretive performance; their general assumption is that heed tends to be uniformly beneficial. By unpacking the micromechanisms that underlie such perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Familiarity leads to the creation of procedural memory, which is knowledge a team member possesses about how to best interact with others in executing organizational routines (Cohen & Bacdayan, 1994). Procedural memory enables the star to better interpret others' actions, which improves her responses (Gavetti & Warglien, 2015).…”
Section: A Star's Return Facilitates An Improvement In Routines Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Familiarity leads to the creation of procedural memory, which is knowledge a team member possesses about how to best interact with others in executing organizational routines (Cohen & Bacdayan, 1994). Procedural memory enables the star to better interpret others' actions, which improves her responses (Gavetti & Warglien, 2015).…”
Section: A Star's Return Facilitates An Improvement In Routines Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially the case for information that does not fit with the firm's existing understandings (Reger, Mullane, Gustafson, & DeMarie, 1994;Tripsas, 2009). Thus, mere access to novel feedback available in online communities may not be enough to prompt organizations to move beyond the mental models constructed through their past experiences (Gavetti & Warglien, 2015).…”
Section: Theory Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trust is an essential component for industrial players to achieve the purpose of combating copycat. The gap among stakeholders in the ecosystem will prevent actors from gaining access to the needed social capital as advocated by studies on collective behaviour and systems (Gavetti & Warglien, 2015;Mortensen, 2014). Meanwhile, it is necessary to embark on joint actions with the consensus of members even though independently, actors might have their own specialized activities to capitalize on.…”
Section: Stakeholder Interactions In the Textile Cluster: The Blame Gamementioning
confidence: 99%