2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/abbe3a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of confocal microscopy measurements combining empirical and physical properties

Abstract: Virtual measuring instruments are useful tools in surface topography measurement and can be applied for the prediction of measuring results and the determination of measurement uncertainty. For optical measuring instruments, often computationally expensive ray-tracing algorithms are applied. Other models provide an approximation of the transfer behavior based on techniques from signal processing or physical considerations of the instrument setup. For confocal microscopy, we suggest the application of a hybrid … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitting process enables a more accurate estimation of the peak position, that is, sample height. Since the peak detection is essential in confocal microscopy, various approaches are constantly being proposed to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of calculation, such as a modeling of confocal microscopy considering physical properties [49], mean-shift vector [50], and Monte Carlo analysis [51]. With peak detection algorithms, the axial resolution, or repeatability of confocal reflectance microscopy is much better than the FWHM of the axial response curve or the depth sampling interval [37,46].…”
Section: Axial Resolution Of Confocal Reflectance Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitting process enables a more accurate estimation of the peak position, that is, sample height. Since the peak detection is essential in confocal microscopy, various approaches are constantly being proposed to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of calculation, such as a modeling of confocal microscopy considering physical properties [49], mean-shift vector [50], and Monte Carlo analysis [51]. With peak detection algorithms, the axial resolution, or repeatability of confocal reflectance microscopy is much better than the FWHM of the axial response curve or the depth sampling interval [37,46].…”
Section: Axial Resolution Of Confocal Reflectance Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%