1981
DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(81)90185-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of ductile fracture based on the nucleation and growth of voids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
143
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 706 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
143
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Puttick [l] and Bluhm & Morrissey [2] were among the first to identify the different stages of ductile fracture by performing controlled interrupted tensile experiments. Different stages of ductile fracture were also identified by LeRoy et a1 [3] for various carbon steels. These investigations have led to a better understanding of the basic micromechanics of the ductile fracture process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Puttick [l] and Bluhm & Morrissey [2] were among the first to identify the different stages of ductile fracture by performing controlled interrupted tensile experiments. Different stages of ductile fracture were also identified by LeRoy et a1 [3] for various carbon steels. These investigations have led to a better understanding of the basic micromechanics of the ductile fracture process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…29) It is generally accepted that if r and w are accurately measured, the stress-strain relation can be predicted beyond necking fairly well in a specimen with a circular cross section. Only if diffuse necking is considered, an empirical expression for the neck geometry parameter introduced by LeRoy 30) could be helpful to simplify calculating r and w which are both difficult to measure with sufficient degree of accuracy, especially in the case of the specimen with square section; 31) w r where, ε pmax implies the true strain when an applied load reaches a maximum value. In order to reduce the possible errors induced by above hypothesis, the Choung's formula 28) which was proposed for the flat specimen with square cross section was also considered in this study.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is postulated that chromium and aluminum, which dissolve in iron carbide and distort the carbide lattice (or form carbide of a different structure), decrease the grain boundary carbide strength. On the other hand, silicon, which does not dissolve in the carbide, does not influence the grain boundary carbide strength (material of Le Roy et al (19)). Manganese is known to produce an M3C type carbide, as does iron, and therefore may behave in a indistinguishable way from iron in influencing the grain boundary strength.…”
Section: Properties and Strengtheninrr Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%