1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(88)83046-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of force production that explains the lag between crossbridge attachment and force after electrical stimulation of striated muscle fibers

Abstract: Whereas the mechanical behavior of fully activated fibers can be explained by assuming that attached force-producing crossbridges exist in at least two configurations, one exerting more force than the other (Huxley A. F., and R. M. Simmons. 1971. Nature [Lond.]. 233:533-538), and the behavior of relaxed fibers can be explained by assuming a single population of weakly binding rapid-equilibrium crossbridges (Schoenberg, M. 1988. Biophys. J. 54:135-148), it has not been possible to explain the transition between… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
28
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
13
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Force and stiffness started to rise with no detectable difference in the latent period after the first stimulus. In accordance with previous results (Bressler & Clinch, 1974;Schoenberg & Wells, 1984;Cecchi, Griffiths & Taylor, 1986;Ford, Huxley & Simmons, 1986;Bagni, Cecchi & Schoenberg, 1988;Hatta, Sugi & Tamura, 1988) stiffness was found to increase more steeply and to reach its maximum values at an earlier time during the tetanus than did force. In eleven experiments performed at 2 10 jtm sarcomere length (1I8-3-5 TC) the time required for attaining 90% of maximum force and 90°% of maximum stiffness was 134 + 4 and 87+5 ms, respectively.…”
Section: Time Course Offorce and Stiffness During Isometric Tetanussupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Force and stiffness started to rise with no detectable difference in the latent period after the first stimulus. In accordance with previous results (Bressler & Clinch, 1974;Schoenberg & Wells, 1984;Cecchi, Griffiths & Taylor, 1986;Ford, Huxley & Simmons, 1986;Bagni, Cecchi & Schoenberg, 1988;Hatta, Sugi & Tamura, 1988) stiffness was found to increase more steeply and to reach its maximum values at an earlier time during the tetanus than did force. In eleven experiments performed at 2 10 jtm sarcomere length (1I8-3-5 TC) the time required for attaining 90% of maximum force and 90°% of maximum stiffness was 134 + 4 and 87+5 ms, respectively.…”
Section: Time Course Offorce and Stiffness During Isometric Tetanussupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The reasons for these differences are not known, particularly considering that the later studies by Palmer and Kentish were carried out on the same preparation using conditions similar to those in this study. Nevertheless, the slowing of the tension time course may represent a decrease in cross-bridge turnover during the rising phase of tension development and is consistent with results from earlier studies on fast and slow skeletal muscle using a real-time phosphate assay (He et al, 1997) or mechanical transients (Ford et al, 1986;Bagni et al, 1988;Josephson and Edman, 1998). The early rapid rates for crossbridge binding and force generation are in accordance with the results from these later mechanical studies of skeletal muscle indicating that the rate for isometric tension recovery after a small quick length change (Ford et al, 1986;Bagni et al, 1988) or maximal shortening velocity (Josephson and Edman, 1998) is faster when applied during the rising phase of a tetanus than when applied on the plateau.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In accordance with previous observations at low temperature in frog muscle (3,8,20,26,29), Fig. 1, C and D, demonstrates that stiffness was in the lead of tension during the rising phase of the tetanus, and this applies to both low and high temperatures.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%