1999
DOI: 10.1080/09695949993026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Formative Assessment in Science Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
152
0
23

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
152
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Black and Wiliam (2006) established specific conditions needed to successfully apply formative assessment. While also investigating formative assessment practices in science education, Cowie and Bell (1999) offered a dual cycle of planned and spontaneous interaction model of assessment. McMillan (2007) further developed the concept of fairness in classroom assessment whereas Torrance and Pryor (2001) studied the social nature of assessment and power relationships.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Black and Wiliam (2006) established specific conditions needed to successfully apply formative assessment. While also investigating formative assessment practices in science education, Cowie and Bell (1999) offered a dual cycle of planned and spontaneous interaction model of assessment. McMillan (2007) further developed the concept of fairness in classroom assessment whereas Torrance and Pryor (2001) studied the social nature of assessment and power relationships.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formative assessment, on the other hand, is the garden equivalent of feeding and watering the plants-directly affecting their growth. (p. 21) This analogy helps to crystallize the differences between these two types of assessment and is also well supported by Cowie and Bell (1999) who say that whereas "Formative assessment is the process used by teachers and children to recognize and respond to pupil learning, in order to enhance that learning during the activity or task" (p. 104), summative assessment is evaluation of what has been learnt after the teaching and learning have been concluded. Consequently, while the former has potential to directly influence learning as it takes place, the latter cannot impact on current learning, but only presents an ex-post view and can only, at best, inform future teaching and learning.…”
Section: The Gardner Analogy To Help With the Distinctionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Even though teachers have noted it down within their lesson plan, they are still having lack of confidence in assessment development. Interactive assessment [24] is used during the interaction between teachers and students using the concept of map in science learning [25] which can be applicable for the INSEP program and fascinating to be researched for its easiness and effectiveness for short term training. With the high scores in assessment development of teachers' efficacy, thus we hope the entire PCK components can be built within their mind.…”
Section: Fig3 Framework Of Inquiry On Supporting Teachers' Pck Andmentioning
confidence: 99%