1982
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1982)021<1015:amolif>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Model of Longwave Irradiance for Use with Surface Observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After further analysis, Josey et al [2003] found that both the Bignami and Clark formulae are not capable of consistently reliable estimates and proposed a new parameterization, which gave a mean bias error with respect to the measurements of −1.3 Wm −2 . However, they agree with Lind and Katsaros [1982] advising the use of radiation transfer models when the necessary data are available. Schiano et al [2000] argued that a single bulk formula with constant numerical coefficients is unable to reproduce the fluxes at the surface for all seasons and all climatic regions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…After further analysis, Josey et al [2003] found that both the Bignami and Clark formulae are not capable of consistently reliable estimates and proposed a new parameterization, which gave a mean bias error with respect to the measurements of −1.3 Wm −2 . However, they agree with Lind and Katsaros [1982] advising the use of radiation transfer models when the necessary data are available. Schiano et al [2000] argued that a single bulk formula with constant numerical coefficients is unable to reproduce the fluxes at the surface for all seasons and all climatic regions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Because of scarceness of radiation measurements they were originally supplemented with radiation calculated from cloudiness observations using formulae based on a method by Lind and Katsaros () and Iqbal (), which was further modified for Finnish conditions (Venäläinen and Heikinheimo, , ; Venäläinen et al , ; Venäläinen and Kangas, ). The number of synoptic stations reporting cloudiness reduced recently, however, with the consequence that interpolated radiation fields based on synoptic observations are no longer usable.…”
Section: Operational Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual cloud emittance is derived from a look-up table with inputs of cloud optical depth, cloud top height, and cloud fraction. The look-up table is from Schmetz et al (1986) and is based on the work of Cox (1976), Lind and Katsaros (1982), and Platt and Bartusek (1974). The cloud base temperature is the most difficult parameter to determine.…”
Section: Cloud Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%