2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2016.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of perceived dynamic range for HDR images

Abstract: For High Dynamic Range (HDR) content, the dynamic range of an image is an important characteristic in algorithm design and validation, analysis of aesthetic attributes and content selection. Traditionally, it has been computed as the ratio between the maximum and minimum pixel luminance, a purely objective measure; however, the human visual system's perception of dynamic range is more complex and has been largely neglected in the literature. In this paper, a new methodology for measuring perceived dynamic rang… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, Screenshot is a screen capture, cropped to match the resolution of test stimuli. These images were selected out of 19 candidate pictures, on the basis of their spatial information, key and colorfulness [19], as well as on their semantics (outdoor, people/faces, man-made objects). Screenshot was selected to include an example of synthetic image, which might be representative of a screen-content compression scenario.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Screenshot is a screen capture, cropped to match the resolution of test stimuli. These images were selected out of 19 candidate pictures, on the basis of their spatial information, key and colorfulness [19], as well as on their semantics (outdoor, people/faces, man-made objects). Screenshot was selected to include an example of synthetic image, which might be representative of a screen-content compression scenario.…”
Section: Subjective Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the formulated model [13] can predict well overall subjective DR scores, we also found significant exceptions and prediction failures. In fact, any DR predictor learned on such a small-size dataset might incur the risk of overfitting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The scores were obtained by asking observers to rate images based on the magnitude of the overall difference between the brightest and darkest region(s) of the picture. Later, we have leveraged this data to evaluate robust dynamic range (DR) measures [6], and to derive a DR predictor which takes into account also the area of highlight regions [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used during the GP run were six images downscaled to half their original resolution. These images were obtained from the subset of 36 images taken from the Fairchild database used in perceptual studies of dynamic range [HDVD16]. This database of images was chosen because of their availability and because they had been selected as they broadly cover the HDR range in the afore-mentioned study.…”
Section: Gp Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure running the method is practical, results comparing the proposed method with state‐of‐the‐art methods are based on the full set of 36 HDR images at HD resolution used in the perceptual study [HDVD16]. They are further augmented for this test by the 19 left eye images from the set of images used for the feature mapping application discussed below and the Stanford Memorial Chapel image for a total of 56 images.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%