2012
DOI: 10.3109/13668250.2012.732221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A model of processes that underpin positive relationships for adults with severe intellectual disability

Abstract: A relationship model with clearly identified processes and sub-elements provides a framework for teaching others how to have positive relationships with people with severe intellectual disability. The model could be applied in training to support relationships between workers and people with a disability and more widely with other community members.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These historical expressions of preference were used to guide Neil's circle of support in making a collective decision that they thought reflected his will and preference. Griffiths & Smith, 2016;Johnson, 2012). The current study's findings not only highlight the importance of relational closeness between people with severe or profound intellectual disability and their supporters, but also provide some insights into what these relationships should look like.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These historical expressions of preference were used to guide Neil's circle of support in making a collective decision that they thought reflected his will and preference. Griffiths & Smith, 2016;Johnson, 2012). The current study's findings not only highlight the importance of relational closeness between people with severe or profound intellectual disability and their supporters, but also provide some insights into what these relationships should look like.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 61%
“…As highlighted by Johnson and her colleagues, there is a lack of understanding of the mechanics of relationship building for people with severe intellectual disability (Johnson, Bigby, Iacono, Douglas, & Katthagen, ). This lack of understanding extends to the mechanics of relationships for people with profound intellectual disability (Dobson, Upadhyaya, & Stanley, ; Griffiths & Smith, ; Johnson, ). The current study's findings not only highlight the importance of relational closeness between people with severe or profound intellectual disability and their supporters, but also provide some insights into what these relationships should look like.…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of routines in providing a context for social interaction has also been noted by Johnson et al . ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The importance of such close and familiar communication partnerships is echoed in the work of Johnson et al . ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Johnson et al . () identified five processes which underpin positive support worker and family relationships with individuals with severe intellectual disability, including ‘sharing the moment’ which encapsulates aforementioned ‘having fun’ as well as ‘hanging out’. The other four processes are ‘recognizing individuality’, ‘connecting’, ‘feeling good’ and ‘sharing the message’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%